Development of a three-dimensional velocity model for the crust and upper mantle in the Barents Sea, Novaya Zemlya and Kola-Karelia regions | BibSonomy

Development of a three-dimensional velocity model for the crust and upper mantle in the Barents Sea, Novaya Zemlya and Kola-Karelia regions
, , , , , , , and .
26th Seismic Research Review --- Trends in nuclear explosion monitoring, page 50--60. Orlando, Florida, (September 2004)

The principal objective of the present study is to compile a three-dimensional (3D) seismic velocity model of the crust and upper mantle for the larger Barents Sea region, at a spatial resolution of nominally 50×50 km. The main accomplishments so far have been concerned with compilation, collation and review of primary existing geophysical data, including first of all deep seismic wide-angle profiles (OBS and ESP – two-ship expanded spread profiles), deep multichannel seismic reflection (MCS) profiles, and shallower 1D velocity profiles. The main source of data has been a data base compiled over many years at the University of Oslo (UiO), supplemented by data compiled at the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and from collaboration partners in Norway and in Russia. Subsequently, detailed comparisons of data and models between the UiO and USGS have been performed, and unified criteria for quality assessment have been developed. The result is a full integration of the underlying data, and a common unified model. The 50×50 km grid tiles in the target region have been defined in an optimum way such that the tiles form a fully equidistant grid. The filling of the grid tiles so far shows a very good coverage in the western Barents Sea, a reasonable coverage also in the Novaya Zemlya region, but is less-constrained in the northern and northeastern parts of the target region. The results show that the depths to Moho vary from about 10 km in the oceanic crustal domain to more than 40 km in coastal regions of Norway and Russia and in the Kara Sea, while sediment thicknesses are 15-20 km in the south-western and eastern parts of the Barents Sea. Following the USGS methodology each grid tile is represented with layers for ice, water, soft sediments, hard sediments, and crystalline upper, middle and lower crust. Finally there is a layer describing the seismic velocity and density of the uppermost mantle, which is controlling Pn and Sn travel times. We have also acquired an upper mantle model (Shapiro and Ritzwoller, 2002) that eventually may be integrated with our new crustal model and tested for a Ground Truth (GT) data base of about 50 events that also has been established as a part of this study. Since some large regional distances also will be used when comparing observed GT travel times with computed travel times through the established model, a mantle velocity model down to about 400 km is needed. To facilitate this travel time testing a number of 2D profiles have been established through the regions that are well covered with initially sampled 1D velocity functions, followed by different smoothing and interpolating techniques, dependent on which modelling method that will be applied. So far 2D ray tracing and finite difference methods have been used here, with preliminary testing also of 3D methods. Since the grid tiles filled with primary data are unevenly distributed it has been necessary also to develop and to test methodologies for interpolation and extrapolation, in order to have all tiles filled. In regions where the data coverage is not dense, geological provinces are defined which are supposed to hold similar tectonic histories. In this case a method is being tested in which the velocity profiles have been used to calculate the crystalline crustal thickness as a function of sediment thickness. Since the crustal rock velocity distribution for a particular geological province is known, a regional depth-to-basement map can used to calculate representative 1D velocity-depth functions for the entire crust. This technique looks promising as a means for providing an equally sampled crustal model, as is required for seismological purposes.
  • @nilsma
This publication has not been reviewed yet.

rating distribution
average user rating0.0 out of 5.0 based on 0 reviews
    Please log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).