Abstract
Background
In 2004 the concept of evidence-based software engineering (EBSE) was introduced at the ICSE04 conference.
Aims
This study assesses the impact of systematic literature reviews (SLRs) which are the recommended EBSE method for aggregating evidence.
Method
We used the standard systematic literature review method employing a manual search of 10 journals and 4 conference proceedings.
Results
Of 20 relevant studies, eight addressed research trends rather than technique evaluation. Seven SLRs addressed cost estimation. The quality of SLRs was fair with only three scoring less than 2 out of 4.
Conclusions
Currently, the topic areas covered by SLRs are limited. European researchers, particularly those at the Simula Laboratory appear to be the leading exponents of systematic literature reviews. The series of cost estimation SLRs demonstrate the potential value of EBSE for synthesising evidence and making it available to practitioners.
Users
Please
log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).