%0 Journal Article %1 doi:10.1080/23808985.2023.2242817 %A Barreto de Souza Martins, Felipe %A Yu, Jingyuan %A Domahidi, Emese %D 2023 %I Routledge %J Annals of the International Communication Association %K brazil health-communication %N 4 %P 479-496 %R 10.1080/23808985.2023.2242817 %T A Global Health Crisis With Divided Research Traditions? a Comparative Review of Brazilian and International Research in Communication on the COVID-19 Pandemic %U https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2023.2242817 %V 47 %X The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in substantial international scientific research from high-income countries, with fewer contributions from low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Utilizing a field theory approach, we contend that these output variations may underscore challenges faced by LMIC researchers in obtaining international academic recognition. Through a systematic review of Brazilian and international Communication research during the pandemic, we identify differences in research interests, constructs, methods, and use of academic references. While international literature prioritizes quantitative surveys, Brazil emphasizes qualitative content analysis. We also observe dissimilarities in covered topics and a limited number of shared references. Research traditions and distinct resource allocations pose additional barriers to international publishing, hampering academic exchanges between these communities.

@article{doi:10.1080/23808985.2023.2242817, abstract = { The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in substantial international scientific research from high-income countries, with fewer contributions from low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Utilizing a field theory approach, we contend that these output variations may underscore challenges faced by LMIC researchers in obtaining international academic recognition. Through a systematic review of Brazilian and international Communication research during the pandemic, we identify differences in research interests, constructs, methods, and use of academic references. While international literature prioritizes quantitative surveys, Brazil emphasizes qualitative content analysis. We also observe dissimilarities in covered topics and a limited number of shared references. Research traditions and distinct resource allocations pose additional barriers to international publishing, hampering academic exchanges between these communities. }, added-at = {2023-11-26T00:59:33.000+0100}, author = {Barreto de Souza Martins, Felipe and Yu, Jingyuan and Domahidi, Emese}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/269f38c74cecbf098156c4e14e2e83133/jpooley}, doi = {10.1080/23808985.2023.2242817}, eprint = {https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2023.2242817}, interhash = {15001e0a1635190787068ebc2cf08d67}, intrahash = {69f38c74cecbf098156c4e14e2e83133}, journal = {Annals of the International Communication Association}, keywords = {brazil health-communication}, number = 4, pages = {479-496}, publisher = {Routledge}, timestamp = {2023-11-26T00:59:33.000+0100}, title = {A Global Health Crisis With Divided Research Traditions? a Comparative Review of Brazilian and International Research in Communication on the COVID-19 Pandemic}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2023.2242817}, volume = 47, year = 2023 }