%0 Generic %1 bonder2015gravity %A Bonder, Yuri %A Okon, Elias %A Sudarsky, Daniel %D 2015 %K Nature decoherence must_read quantum-to-classical_transition %T Can gravity account for the emergence of classicality? %U http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.04363 %X A recent debate has ensued over the claim in Ref. 1 that systems with internal degrees of freedom undergo a universal, gravity-induced, type of decoherence that explains their quantum-to-classical transition. Such decoherence is supposed to arise from the different gravitational redshifts experienced by such systems when placed in a superposition of two wave packets at different heights in a gravitational field. Here we investigate some aspects of the discussion with the aid of simple examples. In particular, we first resolve an apparent conflict between the reported results and the equivalence principle by noting that the static and free fall descriptions focus on states associated with different hypersurfaces. Next, we emphasize that predictions regarding the observability of interference become relevant only in the context of concrete experimental settings. As a result, we caution against hasty claims of universal validity. Finally, we dispute the claim that, at least in the scenarios discussed in Ref. 1, gravitation is responsible for the reported results and we question the alleged ability of decoherence to explain the quantum-to-classical transition. In consequence, we argue against the extraordinary assertion in Ref. 1 that gravity can account for the emergence of classicality.

@misc{bonder2015gravity, abstract = {A recent debate has ensued over the claim in Ref. 1 that systems with internal degrees of freedom undergo a universal, gravity-induced, type of decoherence that explains their quantum-to-classical transition. Such decoherence is supposed to arise from the different gravitational redshifts experienced by such systems when placed in a superposition of two wave packets at different heights in a gravitational field. Here we investigate some aspects of the discussion with the aid of simple examples. In particular, we first resolve an apparent conflict between the reported results and the equivalence principle by noting that the static and free fall descriptions focus on states associated with different hypersurfaces. Next, we emphasize that predictions regarding the observability of interference become relevant only in the context of concrete experimental settings. As a result, we caution against hasty claims of universal validity. Finally, we dispute the claim that, at least in the scenarios discussed in Ref. 1, gravitation is responsible for the reported results and we question the alleged ability of decoherence to explain the quantum-to-classical transition. In consequence, we argue against the extraordinary assertion in Ref. 1 that gravity can account for the emergence of classicality.}, added-at = {2015-09-17T08:24:54.000+0200}, author = {Bonder, Yuri and Okon, Elias and Sudarsky, Daniel}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/246a6462ec1b1d4dda930f0cca6014f39/tcsisman}, description = {Can gravity account for the emergence of classicality?}, interhash = {8e6cd67d13a6968e4f9fb7f4109b5d94}, intrahash = {46a6462ec1b1d4dda930f0cca6014f39}, keywords = {Nature decoherence must_read quantum-to-classical_transition}, note = {cite arxiv:1509.04363Comment: 9 pages, 6 figures}, timestamp = {2015-09-17T08:24:54.000+0200}, title = {Can gravity account for the emergence of classicality?}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.04363}, year = 2015 }