This paper is concise report on an internet survey of economists to acertain their satisfaction with peer review processess of publishing in economics journals.
Please log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).
Cite this publication
More citation styles
- please select -
%0 Book Section
%1 Seidl(2008)
%A Seidl, Christian
%A Schmidt, Ulrich
%A Grösche, Peter
%D 2008
%E Albert, Max
%E Schmidtchen, Dieter
%E Voigt, Stefan
%I Mohr Siebeck
%K Economics Umfrage VWL Zeitschriften review_verfahren
%P 235-265
%T A beauty contest of referee processes of Economics Journals
%X This paper is concise report on an internet survey of economists to acertain their satisfaction with peer review processess of publishing in economics journals.
@inbook{Seidl(2008),
abstract = {This paper is concise report on an internet survey of economists to acertain their satisfaction with peer review processess of publishing in economics journals.},
added-at = {2009-03-12T14:06:59.000+0100},
author = {Seidl, Christian and Schmidt, Ulrich and Grösche, Peter},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/28b63510f1f6daca01f92d4e4a1e35ce8/sschaefers},
editor = {Albert, Max and Schmidtchen, Dieter and Voigt, Stefan},
interhash = {f0b63e570076c36b18131637032e7281},
intrahash = {8b63510f1f6daca01f92d4e4a1e35ce8},
keywords = {Economics Umfrage VWL Zeitschriften review_verfahren},
pages = {235-265},
publisher = {Mohr Siebeck},
timestamp = {2009-07-10T13:08:18.000+0200},
title = {A beauty contest of referee processes of Economics Journals},
year = 2008
}