We have quantified the effects of approximations usually made even in accurate CCSD(T)/CBS calculations of noncovalent interactions, often considered as the âgold standardâ of computational chemistry. We have investigated the effect of excitation series truncation, frozen core approximation, and relativistic effects in a set of 24 model complexes. The final CCSD(T) results at the complete basis set limit with corrections to these approximations are the most accurate estimate of the true interaction energies in noncovalent complexes available. The average error due to these approximations was found to be about 1.5% of the interaction energy.
%0 Journal Article
%1 doi:10.1021/ct400057w
%A Rezá¡c, Jan
%A Hobza, Pavel
%D 2013
%J Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
%K analysis chemistry error quantum thermodynamics unread
%N 5
%P 2151-2155
%R 10.1021/ct400057w
%T Describing Noncovalent Interactions beyond the Common Approximations: How Accurate Is the "Gold Standard," CCSD(T) at the Complete Basis Set Limit?
%U http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ct400057w
%V 9
%X We have quantified the effects of approximations usually made even in accurate CCSD(T)/CBS calculations of noncovalent interactions, often considered as the âgold standardâ of computational chemistry. We have investigated the effect of excitation series truncation, frozen core approximation, and relativistic effects in a set of 24 model complexes. The final CCSD(T) results at the complete basis set limit with corrections to these approximations are the most accurate estimate of the true interaction energies in noncovalent complexes available. The average error due to these approximations was found to be about 1.5% of the interaction energy.
@article{doi:10.1021/ct400057w,
abstract = { We have quantified the effects of approximations usually made even in accurate CCSD(T)/CBS calculations of noncovalent interactions, often considered as the âgold standardâ of computational chemistry. We have investigated the effect of excitation series truncation, frozen core approximation, and relativistic effects in a set of 24 model complexes. The final CCSD(T) results at the complete basis set limit with corrections to these approximations are the most accurate estimate of the true interaction energies in noncovalent complexes available. The average error due to these approximations was found to be about 1.5% of the interaction energy. },
added-at = {2013-05-25T19:27:51.000+0200},
author = {\vee{R}ez\'{a}¡\vee{c}, Jan and Hobza, Pavel},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/21d857aadd2fa1d8c164932c86260d1e1/drmatusek},
doi = {10.1021/ct400057w},
eprint = {http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ct400057w},
interhash = {c4b846eb23cd026f40946599f815f1a8},
intrahash = {1d857aadd2fa1d8c164932c86260d1e1},
journal = {Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation},
keywords = {analysis chemistry error quantum thermodynamics unread},
month = may,
number = 5,
pages = {2151-2155},
timestamp = {2013-05-25T19:27:51.000+0200},
title = {Describing Noncovalent Interactions beyond the Common Approximations: How Accurate Is the "Gold Standard," CCSD(T) at the Complete Basis Set Limit?},
url = {http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ct400057w},
volume = 9,
year = 2013
}