OPTIMUM EFFICIENT MOBILITY MANAGEMENT SCHEME FOR IPv6
V. Kumar. International Journal of Next-Generation Networks (IJNGN, 4 (3):
63 - 72(September 2012)
Abstract
Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) and Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) both are the mobility management solutions proposed by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) to support IP Mobility. It’s been an important issue, that upon certain condition, out of MIPv6 and HMIPv6 which one is better. In this paper an Optimum Efficient Mobility Management (OEMM) scheme is described on the basis of analytical model which shows that OEMM Scheme is better in terms of performance and applicability of MIPv6 and HMIPv6. It shows that which one is better alternative between MIPv6 and HMIPv6 and if HMIPv6 is adopted it chooses the best Mobility Anchor Point (MAP). Finally it is illustrated that OEMM scheme is better than that of MIPv6 and HMIPv6.
%0 Journal Article
%1 virenderkumaroptimum
%A Kumar, Virender
%D 2012
%J International Journal of Next-Generation Networks (IJNGN
%K Access Anchor Hierarchical IPv6 Mobile Mobility Point. Regional Router Size
%N 3
%P 63 - 72
%T OPTIMUM EFFICIENT MOBILITY MANAGEMENT SCHEME FOR IPv6
%U http://airccse.org/journal/ijngn/current2012.html
%V 4
%X Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) and Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) both are the mobility management solutions proposed by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) to support IP Mobility. It’s been an important issue, that upon certain condition, out of MIPv6 and HMIPv6 which one is better. In this paper an Optimum Efficient Mobility Management (OEMM) scheme is described on the basis of analytical model which shows that OEMM Scheme is better in terms of performance and applicability of MIPv6 and HMIPv6. It shows that which one is better alternative between MIPv6 and HMIPv6 and if HMIPv6 is adopted it chooses the best Mobility Anchor Point (MAP). Finally it is illustrated that OEMM scheme is better than that of MIPv6 and HMIPv6.
@article{virenderkumaroptimum,
abstract = {Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) and Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) both are the mobility management solutions proposed by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) to support IP Mobility. It’s been an important issue, that upon certain condition, out of MIPv6 and HMIPv6 which one is better. In this paper an Optimum Efficient Mobility Management (OEMM) scheme is described on the basis of analytical model which shows that OEMM Scheme is better in terms of performance and applicability of MIPv6 and HMIPv6. It shows that which one is better alternative between MIPv6 and HMIPv6 and if HMIPv6 is adopted it chooses the best Mobility Anchor Point (MAP). Finally it is illustrated that OEMM scheme is better than that of MIPv6 and HMIPv6.},
added-at = {2018-04-20T13:53:35.000+0200},
author = {Kumar, Virender},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/234fc7a6a447e5faf92ac085507204c18/ijfls},
interhash = {2b286ac588ffe9277e9e804b006f5d05},
intrahash = {34fc7a6a447e5faf92ac085507204c18},
journal = {International Journal of Next-Generation Networks (IJNGN},
keywords = {Access Anchor Hierarchical IPv6 Mobile Mobility Point. Regional Router Size},
month = sep,
number = 3,
pages = {63 - 72},
timestamp = {2018-04-20T13:53:35.000+0200},
title = {OPTIMUM EFFICIENT MOBILITY MANAGEMENT SCHEME FOR IPv6 },
url = {http://airccse.org/journal/ijngn/current2012.html},
volume = 4,
year = 2012
}