@nilsma

Ground Truth collection for mining explosions in northern Fennoscandia and northwestern Russia

, , , , , , , , and . 27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-based nuclear explosion monitoring technologies, page 31--41. Rancho Mirage, California, (September 2005)

Abstract

We concluded comprehensive ground truth collection at the Khibiny, Olenegorsk, Kovdor and Zapolyarnyi mines, and have basic information on 2052 explosions. In the past two years we used this ground truth information to extract waveform data from the ARCES array and a number of regional stations (KEV, LVZ, APA) as well as from six stations that we deployed along two lines stretching between the Khibiny Massif mines and the region around the ARCES array. We calculated P/S ratios using the ARCES array data for many of these events comprising several source types (compact underground explosions, underground ripple-fired explosions, surface ripple-fired explosions). We found that the P/S ratios of small compact underground explosions in mines of the Khibiny Massif are systematically lower than the P/S ratios of large ripple-fired surface explosions. We had anticipated that smaller underground shots would appear more like single well-coupled explosions, thus having higher P/S ratios than large ripple-fired explosions. A possible explanation for this phenomenon is that the compact underground explosions in these mines are designed to fracture and drop a large quantity of ore from the ceiling of a horizontal shaft. The potential energy released by the falling ore may express as shear wave energy, which may be considerably greater than the (P wave) energy released directly by the explosive. We concluded the deployment of the six stations along the Khibiny-ARCES lines this past summer; this year we are examining the data from these stations to see how P/S ratios vary with range from the source. We expect to have an update on the P/S ratio analysis contrasting different source types for this years SRR meeting, with the addition of an analysis of range dependence using data from the temporary stations. The portable stations were redeployed in the fall of 2004 to the Kiruna and Malmberget underground mines in northern Sweden. The stations deployed in Malmberget also record events from the surface mining operations at the Aitik mine, located some 15 km from Malmberget mine. The data from these stations will allow comparisons of seismic waveforms resulting from different types of shooting practices at different locations within the mines. These stations will provide ground truth on a large number of explosions at these mines allowing future analyses of the dependence of discriminants on source type, possibly assessing the portability of results obtained with the Khibiny explosion observations.

Links and resources

Tags