@nonancourt

Many random walks are faster than one

, , , , , and . SPAA '08: Proceedings of the twentieth annual symposium on Parallelism in algorithms and architectures, page 119--128. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2008)
DOI: 10.1145/1378533.1378557

Abstract

We pose a new and intriguing question motivated by distributed computing regarding random walks on graphs: How long does it take for several independent random walks, starting from the same vertex, to cover an entire graph? We study the cover time - the expected time required to visit every node in a graph at least once - and we show that for a large collection of interesting graphs, running many random walks in parallel yields a speed-up in the cover time that is linear in the number of parallel walks. We demonstrate that an exponential speed-up is sometimes possible, but that some natural graphs allow only a logarithmic speed-up. A problem related to ours (in which the walks start from some probablistic distribution on vertices) was previously studied in the context of space efficient algorithms for undirected s - t -connectivity and our results yield, in certain cases, an improvement upon some of the earlier bounds.

Links and resources

Tags

community

  • @emrahcem
  • @nonancourt
@nonancourt's tags highlighted