Traditional retrieval evaluation uses explicit relevance judgments which are expensive to collect. Relevance assessments inferred from implicit feedback such as click-through data can be collected inexpensively, but may be less reliable. We compare assessments derived from click-through data to another source of implicit feedback that we assume to be highly indicative of relevance: purchase decisions. Evaluating retrieval runs based on a log of an audio-visual archive, we find agreement between system rankings and purchase decisions to be surprisingly high.
Beschreibung
Comparing click-through data to purchase decisions for retrieval evaluation
%0 Conference Paper
%1 hofmann2010comparing
%A Hofmann, Katja
%A Huurnink, Bouke
%A Bron, Marc
%A de Rijke, Maarten
%B Proceeding of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
%C New York, NY, USA
%D 2010
%I ACM
%K evaluation implicit-feedback ranking search social-search
%P 761--762
%R 10.1145/1835449.1835603
%T Comparing click-through data to purchase decisions for retrieval evaluation
%U http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1835449.1835603
%X Traditional retrieval evaluation uses explicit relevance judgments which are expensive to collect. Relevance assessments inferred from implicit feedback such as click-through data can be collected inexpensively, but may be less reliable. We compare assessments derived from click-through data to another source of implicit feedback that we assume to be highly indicative of relevance: purchase decisions. Evaluating retrieval runs based on a log of an audio-visual archive, we find agreement between system rankings and purchase decisions to be surprisingly high.
%@ 978-1-4503-0153-4
@inproceedings{hofmann2010comparing,
abstract = {Traditional retrieval evaluation uses explicit relevance judgments which are expensive to collect. Relevance assessments inferred from implicit feedback such as click-through data can be collected inexpensively, but may be less reliable. We compare assessments derived from click-through data to another source of implicit feedback that we assume to be highly indicative of relevance: purchase decisions. Evaluating retrieval runs based on a log of an audio-visual archive, we find agreement between system rankings and purchase decisions to be surprisingly high.},
acmid = {1835603},
added-at = {2011-07-27T16:24:21.000+0200},
address = {New York, NY, USA},
author = {Hofmann, Katja and Huurnink, Bouke and Bron, Marc and de Rijke, Maarten},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/283f012654e2e6e094daeebb366d799ad/beate},
booktitle = {Proceeding of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval},
description = {Comparing click-through data to purchase decisions for retrieval evaluation},
doi = {10.1145/1835449.1835603},
interhash = {204543f9431d0007339333fa4dcbca4f},
intrahash = {83f012654e2e6e094daeebb366d799ad},
isbn = {978-1-4503-0153-4},
keywords = {evaluation implicit-feedback ranking search social-search},
location = {Geneva, Switzerland},
numpages = {2},
pages = {761--762},
publisher = {ACM},
series = {SIGIR '10},
timestamp = {2011-07-27T16:24:21.000+0200},
title = {Comparing click-through data to purchase decisions for retrieval evaluation},
url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1835449.1835603},
year = 2010
}