@drtester

CNS disease in younger patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma: an analysis of patients treated on the Mabthera International Trial and trials of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group

, , , , , , , , , and . Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO, 23 (5): 1267–1273 (2012)

Abstract

BACKGROUND\r\nTo describe incidence, risk factors, and influence of treatment on occurrence of central nervous system (CNS) relapse or progression in younger patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma.\r\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\r\nWe analyzed 2210 patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma treated on various studies for CNS relapse/progression. Treatment consisted of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) ± etoposide. Six hundred and twenty patients also received rituximab. CNS prophylaxis was intrathecal methotrexate on High-CHOEP and MegaCHOEP phase III studies if upper neck, head, bone marrow, or testes were involved.\r\nRESULTS\r\nFifty-six of 2196 patients (2.6\%) developed CNS disease. It occurred early (median 7.0 months), median survival was 5.0 months. Patients with age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) 0 or 1 treated with rituximab showed a low risk for CNS disease (2-year rates: 0\% or 0.5\%), and rituximab decreased the risk (relative risk 0.3, 95\% confidence interval 0.1-0.9, P = 0.029). Patients with aaIPI 2 or 3 showed a moderate risk (4.2\%-9.7\%) and no significant reduction of CNS disease with rituximab. CNS prophylaxis was of no significant benefit.\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIn younger patients with aaIPI 0 or 1, CNS relapse/progression is very rare; in patients with aaIPI 2 or 3, the risk is higher (up to 10\%) and requires new diagnostic strategies and treatment.

Links and resources

Tags