%0 Journal Article %1 Baxter2014Weak %A Baxter, Gareth J. %A Dorogovtsev, Sergey N. %A Mendes, José F. F. %A Cellai, Davide %D 2014 %J Physical Review E %K percolation critical-phenomena multiplex-networks bootstrap %N 4 %P 042801+ %R 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042801 %T Weak percolation on multiplex networks %U http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042801 %V 89 %X Bootstrap percolation is a simple but non-trivial model. It has applications in many areas of science and has been explored on random networks for several decades. In single layer (simplex) networks, it has been recently observed that bootstrap percolation, which is defined as an incremental process, can be seen as the opposite of pruning percolation, where nodes are removed according to a connectivity rule. Here we propose both a new model of bootstrap and of pruning percolation for multiplex networks. We collectively refer to these two models with the concept of "weak" percolation, to distinguish them from the somewhat classical concept of ordinary ("strong") percolation. While the two models coincide in simplex networks, we show that they decouple when considering multiplexes, giving rise to a wealth of critical phenomena. Our bootstrap model constitutes the simplest example of a contagion process on a multiplex network and has potential applications in critical infrastructure recovery and information security. Moreover, we show that our pruning percolation model may provide a way to diagnose missing layers in a multiplex network. Finally, our analytical approach allows us to calculate critical behavior and characterize critical clusters.

@article{Baxter2014Weak, abstract = {{Bootstrap percolation is a simple but non-trivial model. It has applications in many areas of science and has been explored on random networks for several decades. In single layer (simplex) networks, it has been recently observed that bootstrap percolation, which is defined as an incremental process, can be seen as the opposite of pruning percolation, where nodes are removed according to a connectivity rule. Here we propose both a new model of bootstrap and of pruning percolation for multiplex networks. We collectively refer to these two models with the concept of "weak" percolation, to distinguish them from the somewhat classical concept of ordinary ("strong") percolation. While the two models coincide in simplex networks, we show that they decouple when considering multiplexes, giving rise to a wealth of critical phenomena. Our bootstrap model constitutes the simplest example of a contagion process on a multiplex network and has potential applications in critical infrastructure recovery and information security. Moreover, we show that our pruning percolation model may provide a way to diagnose missing layers in a multiplex network. Finally, our analytical approach allows us to calculate critical behavior and characterize critical clusters.}}, added-at = {2019-06-10T14:53:09.000+0200}, archiveprefix = {arXiv}, author = {Baxter, Gareth J. and Dorogovtsev, Sergey N. and Mendes, Jos\'{e} F. F. and Cellai, Davide}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/295a22dc2c5e45d6ae80f53b199c48966/nonancourt}, citeulike-article-id = {12843348}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042801}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3814}, citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.3814}, day = 3, doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042801}, eprint = {1312.3814}, interhash = {77406f0813c71098b9424d7db981f13f}, intrahash = {95a22dc2c5e45d6ae80f53b199c48966}, issn = {1550-2376}, journal = {Physical Review E}, keywords = {percolation critical-phenomena multiplex-networks bootstrap}, month = apr, number = 4, pages = {042801+}, posted-at = {2013-12-16 09:07:01}, priority = {2}, timestamp = {2019-08-23T10:58:50.000+0200}, title = {{Weak percolation on multiplex networks}}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042801}, volume = 89, year = 2014 }