%0 Journal Article %1 holzhauser2021quantifying %A Holzhauser, Nicole %D 2021 %I Routledge %J International Review of Sociology %K disziplin entwicklung soziologie %N 1 %P 97-122 %R 10.1080/03906701.2021.1926673 %T Quantifying the exclusionary process of canonisation, or How to become a classic of the social sciences %U /brokenurl# https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2021.1926673 %V 31 %X ABSTRACTThis article theoretically and empirically analyses the allocation of recognition and status in a scientific community and of the rank ‘classic’ to better comprehend the selective and reputational mechanisms at work since the beginning of the discipline. The aim is to examine the process of canonisation and the exclusionary logic, which systematically eliminates certain knowledge of specific scholars over time. The role of cultural capital , such as excellent scientific work and its recognition, is taken into consideration in contrast to social capital, such as influential social positions within the field, and to personal attributes such as gender, regarding their relevance for status. A unique database of 957 scholars representing the field of early German sociology was created, and a quantitative analysis was conducted. The results indicate the field was structured very unequally with high rewards for scholars with social capital. However, other than what one might expect, social power does not appear to be relevant for joining the classics canon in the twentieth century. Regardless of the type of capital, while there is great continuity for the most successful male scholars without social positions, women were largely excluded . Exclusionary mechanisms, eliminating the knowledge produced by minorities, may still be at work.

@article{holzhauser2021quantifying, abstract = { ABSTRACTThis article theoretically and empirically analyses the allocation of recognition and status in a scientific community and of the rank ‘classic’ to better comprehend the selective and reputational mechanisms at work since the beginning of the discipline. The aim is to examine the process of canonisation and the exclusionary logic, which systematically eliminates certain knowledge of specific scholars over time. The role of cultural capital , such as excellent scientific work and its recognition, is taken into consideration in contrast to social capital, such as influential social positions within the field, and to personal attributes such as gender, regarding their relevance for status. A unique database of 957 scholars representing the field of early German sociology was created, and a quantitative analysis was conducted. The results indicate the field was structured very unequally with high rewards for scholars with social capital. However, other than what one might expect, social power does not appear to be relevant for joining the classics canon in the twentieth century. Regardless of the type of capital, while there is great continuity for the most successful male scholars without social positions, women were largely excluded . Exclusionary mechanisms, eliminating the knowledge produced by minorities, may still be at work. }, added-at = {2021-10-18T15:29:03.000+0200}, author = {Holzhauser, Nicole}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/29f002fcb96232b7cf823c79c6259d6ee/wdees}, doi = {10.1080/03906701.2021.1926673}, eprint = {https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2021.1926673}, interhash = {b59364c7e638af2c7221a130233fa61b}, intrahash = {9f002fcb96232b7cf823c79c6259d6ee}, journal = {International Review of Sociology}, keywords = {disziplin entwicklung soziologie}, number = 1, pages = {97-122}, publisher = {Routledge}, timestamp = {2021-10-18T15:29:03.000+0200}, title = {Quantifying the exclusionary process of canonisation, or How to become a classic of the social sciences}, url = {/brokenurl# https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2021.1926673 }, volume = 31, year = 2021 }