%0 Journal Article %1 kohrs2023eleven %A Kohrs, Friederike E. %A Auer, Susann %A Bannach-Brown, Alexandra %A Fiedler, Susann %A Haven, Tamarinde Laura %A Heise, Verena %A Holman, Constance %A Azevedo, Flavio %A Bernard, René %A Bleier, Armin %A Bössel, Nicole %A Cahill, Brian Patrick %A Castro, Leyla Jael %A Ehrenhofer, Adrian %A Eichel, Kristina %A Frank, Maximillian %A Frick, Claudia %A Friese, Malte %A Gärtner, Anne %A Gierend, Kerstin %A Grüning, David Joachim %A Hahn, Lena %A Hülsemann, Maren %A Ihle, Malika %A Illius, Sabrina %A König, Laura %A König, Matthias %A Kulke, Louisa %A Kutlin, Anton %A Lammers, Fritjof %A Mehler, David MA %A Miehl, Christoph %A Müller-Alcazar, Anett %A Neuendorf, Claudia %A Niemeyer, Helen %A Pargent, Florian %A Peikert, Aaron %A Pfeuffer, Christina U. %A Reinecke, Robert %A Röer, Jan Philipp %A Rohmann, Jessica L. %A Sánchez-Tójar, Alfredo %A Scherbaum, Stefan %A Sixtus, Elena %A Spitzer, Lisa %A Straßburger, Vera Maren %A Weber, Marcel %A Whitmire, Clarissa J. %A Zerna, Josephine %A Zorbek, Dilara %A Zumstein, Philipp %A Weissgerber, Tracey L. %D 2023 %I eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd %J eLife %K education research rigor scientific_transparency %P e89736 %R 10.7554/eLife.89736 %T Eleven strategies for making reproducible research and open science training the norm at research institutions %U https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.89736 %V 12 %X Reproducible research and open science practices have the potential to accelerate scientific progress by allowing others to reuse research outputs, and by promoting rigorous research that is more likely to yield trustworthy results. However, these practices are uncommon in many fields, so there is a clear need for training that helps and encourages researchers to integrate reproducible research and open science practices into their daily work. Here, we outline eleven strategies for making training in these practices the norm at research institutions. The strategies, which emerged from a virtual brainstorming event organized in collaboration with the German Reproducibility Network, are concentrated in three areas: (i) adapting research assessment criteria and program requirements; (ii) training; (iii) building communities. We provide a brief overview of each strategy, offer tips for implementation, and provide links to resources. We also highlight the importance of allocating resources and monitoring impact. Our goal is to encourage researchers -- in their roles as scientists, supervisors, mentors, instructors, and members of curriculum, hiring or evaluation committees -- to think creatively about the many ways they can promote reproducible research and open science practices in their institutions.

@article{kohrs2023eleven, abstract = {Reproducible research and open science practices have the potential to accelerate scientific progress by allowing others to reuse research outputs, and by promoting rigorous research that is more likely to yield trustworthy results. However, these practices are uncommon in many fields, so there is a clear need for training that helps and encourages researchers to integrate reproducible research and open science practices into their daily work. Here, we outline eleven strategies for making training in these practices the norm at research institutions. The strategies, which emerged from a virtual brainstorming event organized in collaboration with the German Reproducibility Network, are concentrated in three areas: (i) adapting research assessment criteria and program requirements; (ii) training; (iii) building communities. We provide a brief overview of each strategy, offer tips for implementation, and provide links to resources. We also highlight the importance of allocating resources and monitoring impact. Our goal is to encourage researchers -- in their roles as scientists, supervisors, mentors, instructors, and members of curriculum, hiring or evaluation committees -- to think creatively about the many ways they can promote reproducible research and open science practices in their institutions.}, added-at = {2023-11-24T13:31:34.000+0100}, author = {Kohrs, Friederike E. and Auer, Susann and Bannach-Brown, Alexandra and Fiedler, Susann and Haven, Tamarinde Laura and Heise, Verena and Holman, Constance and Azevedo, Flavio and Bernard, Ren{\'e} and Bleier, Armin and B{\"o}ssel, Nicole and Cahill, Brian Patrick and Castro, Leyla Jael and Ehrenhofer, Adrian and Eichel, Kristina and Frank, Maximillian and Frick, Claudia and Friese, Malte and G{\"a}rtner, Anne and Gierend, Kerstin and Gr{\"u}ning, David Joachim and Hahn, Lena and H{\"u}lsemann, Maren and Ihle, Malika and Illius, Sabrina and K{\"o}nig, Laura and K{\"o}nig, Matthias and Kulke, Louisa and Kutlin, Anton and Lammers, Fritjof and Mehler, David MA and Miehl, Christoph and M{\"u}ller-Alcazar, Anett and Neuendorf, Claudia and Niemeyer, Helen and Pargent, Florian and Peikert, Aaron and Pfeuffer, Christina U. and Reinecke, Robert and R{\"o}er, Jan Philipp and Rohmann, Jessica L. and S{\'a}nchez-T{\'o}jar, Alfredo and Scherbaum, Stefan and Sixtus, Elena and Spitzer, Lisa and Stra{\ss}burger, Vera Maren and Weber, Marcel and Whitmire, Clarissa J. and Zerna, Josephine and Zorbek, Dilara and Zumstein, Philipp and Weissgerber, Tracey L.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d00403c7983c4ab1b0988cfea90a45cc/tabularii}, day = 23, doi = {10.7554/eLife.89736}, interhash = {81e84a7e4639dc99b06235f77fed8e7f}, intrahash = {d00403c7983c4ab1b0988cfea90a45cc}, issn = {2050-084X}, journal = {eLife}, keywords = {education research rigor scientific_transparency}, month = nov, note = {eLife 2023;12:e89736}, pages = {e89736}, publisher = {eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd}, timestamp = {2023-11-24T13:31:34.000+0100}, title = {Eleven strategies for making reproducible research and open science training the norm at research institutions}, url = {https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.89736}, volume = 12, year = 2023 }