Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of therapeutic trial reports.
I. Scott, and P. Greenberg. Internal medicine journal, 35 (10):
611-21(October 2005)6625<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20071115; JID: 101092952; RF: 98; ppublish; Molts exemples d'errors i biaixos<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Critical appraisal; RCT; Introductori.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00929.x
Abstract
Practising clinicians are assailed daily with reports of new therapeutic clinical trials. The evidence-based medicine movement has developed critical appraisal methods for assessing the validity and impact of such studies. However, challenges persist in regards to the appropriate interpretation and application of trial results within everyday clinical settings. Using selected examples from recently published literature, we illustrate 15 cautionary themes for translating research evidence from therapeutic trials into clinical practice.
%0 Journal Article
%1 Scott2005
%A Scott, I A
%A Greenberg, P B
%D 2005
%J Internal medicine journal
%K Evidence-BasedMedicine Evidence-BasedMedicine:methods Humans PracticeGuidelinesasTopic RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards ReproducibilityofResults RCT
%N 10
%P 611-21
%R 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00929.x
%T Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of therapeutic trial reports.
%U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16207261
%V 35
%X Practising clinicians are assailed daily with reports of new therapeutic clinical trials. The evidence-based medicine movement has developed critical appraisal methods for assessing the validity and impact of such studies. However, challenges persist in regards to the appropriate interpretation and application of trial results within everyday clinical settings. Using selected examples from recently published literature, we illustrate 15 cautionary themes for translating research evidence from therapeutic trials into clinical practice.
%@ 1444-0903; 1444-0903
@article{Scott2005,
abstract = {Practising clinicians are assailed daily with reports of new therapeutic clinical trials. The evidence-based medicine movement has developed critical appraisal methods for assessing the validity and impact of such studies. However, challenges persist in regards to the appropriate interpretation and application of trial results within everyday clinical settings. Using selected examples from recently published literature, we illustrate 15 cautionary themes for translating research evidence from therapeutic trials into clinical practice.},
added-at = {2023-02-03T11:44:35.000+0100},
author = {Scott, I A and Greenberg, P B},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d2624539d900c97a5c0e5c90d1fe8cb6/jepcastel},
city = {Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. ian_scott@health.qld.gov.au},
doi = {10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00929.x},
interhash = {37cf02058ae59ba8b4cfe3d3de7dc5c5},
intrahash = {d2624539d900c97a5c0e5c90d1fe8cb6},
isbn = {1444-0903; 1444-0903},
issn = {1444-0903},
journal = {Internal medicine journal},
keywords = {Evidence-BasedMedicine Evidence-BasedMedicine:methods Humans PracticeGuidelinesasTopic RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards ReproducibilityofResults RCT},
month = {10},
note = {6625<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20071115; JID: 101092952; RF: 98; ppublish; Molts exemples d'errors i biaixos<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Critical appraisal; RCT; Introductori},
number = 10,
pages = {611-21},
pmid = {16207261},
timestamp = {2023-05-04T09:00:45.000+0200},
title = {Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of therapeutic trial reports.},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16207261},
volume = 35,
year = 2005
}