A. McCook. The Scientist - Magazine of the Life Sciences, 20 (2):
26(2006)
Abstract
Submissions are up, reviewers are overtaxed, and authors are lodging complaint after complaint about the process at top-tier journals. What's wrong with peer review?
%0 Journal Article
%1 mccook2006review
%A McCook, Alison
%D 2006
%J The Scientist - Magazine of the Life Sciences
%K 12452 cra peer peer-review review
%N 2
%P 26
%T Is Peer Review Broken?
%U http://classic.the-scientist.com/2006/2/1/26/1/
%V 20
%X Submissions are up, reviewers are overtaxed, and authors are lodging complaint after complaint about the process at top-tier journals. What's wrong with peer review?
@article{mccook2006review,
abstract = {Submissions are up, reviewers are overtaxed, and authors are lodging complaint after complaint about the process at top-tier journals. What's wrong with peer review?},
added-at = {2012-04-19T14:43:29.000+0200},
author = {McCook, Alison},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2f50b9e6dc70a7ad6963c7653481c2f0a/cram},
interhash = {24738327fb06d67393bb8cb318d71b77},
intrahash = {f50b9e6dc70a7ad6963c7653481c2f0a},
journal = {The Scientist - Magazine of the Life Sciences},
keywords = {12452 cra peer peer-review review},
number = 2,
pages = 26,
timestamp = {2012-04-19T14:43:29.000+0200},
title = {Is Peer Review Broken?},
url = {http://classic.the-scientist.com/2006/2/1/26/1/},
volume = 20,
year = 2006
}