%0 Journal Article %1 water %A Pendergast, MaryTheresa M. %A Hoek, Eric M.V. %D 2011 %I The Royal Society of Chemistry %J Energy Environ. Sci. %K bijel %N 6 %P 1946-1971 %R 10.1039/C0EE00541J %T A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies %U http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00541J %V 4 %X Nanotechnology is being used to enhance conventional ceramic and polymeric water treatment membrane materials through various avenues. Among the numerous concepts proposed, the most promising to date include zeolitic and catalytic nanoparticle coated ceramic membranes, hybrid inorganic-organic nanocomposite membranes, and bio-inspired membranes such as hybrid protein-polymer biomimetic membranes, aligned nanotube membranes, and isoporous block copolymer membranes. A semi-quantitative ranking system was proposed considering projected performance enhancement (over state-of-the-art analogs) and state of commercial readiness. Performance enhancement was based on water permeability, solute selectivity, and operational robustness, while commercial readiness was based on known or anticipated material costs, scalability (for large scale water treatment applications), and compatibility with existing manufacturing infrastructure. Overall, bio-inspired membranes are farthest from commercial reality, but offer the most promise for performance enhancements; however, nanocomposite membranes offering significant performance enhancements are already commercially available. Zeolitic and catalytic membranes appear reasonably far from commercial reality and offer small to moderate performance enhancements. The ranking of each membrane nanotechnology is discussed along with the key commercialization hurdles for each membrane nanotechnology.

@article{water, abstract = {Nanotechnology is being used to enhance conventional ceramic and polymeric water treatment membrane materials through various avenues. Among the numerous concepts proposed{,} the most promising to date include zeolitic and catalytic nanoparticle coated ceramic membranes{,} hybrid inorganic-organic nanocomposite membranes{,} and bio-inspired membranes such as hybrid protein-polymer biomimetic membranes{,} aligned nanotube membranes{,} and isoporous block copolymer membranes. A semi-quantitative ranking system was proposed considering projected performance enhancement (over state-of-the-art analogs) and state of commercial readiness. Performance enhancement was based on water permeability{,} solute selectivity{,} and operational robustness{,} while commercial readiness was based on known or anticipated material costs{,} scalability (for large scale water treatment applications){,} and compatibility with existing manufacturing infrastructure. Overall{,} bio-inspired membranes are farthest from commercial reality{,} but offer the most promise for performance enhancements; however{,} nanocomposite membranes offering significant performance enhancements are already commercially available. Zeolitic and catalytic membranes appear reasonably far from commercial reality and offer small to moderate performance enhancements. The ranking of each membrane nanotechnology is discussed along with the key commercialization hurdles for each membrane nanotechnology.}, added-at = {2014-02-14T13:20:33.000+0100}, author = {Pendergast, MaryTheresa M. and Hoek, Eric M.V.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2f9ac4d1ab57568f81aa2b37beb459023/ross_mck}, description = {A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies - Energy & Environmental Science (RSC Publishing)}, doi = {10.1039/C0EE00541J}, interhash = {a4a4e3c0ca5aa9e169612a195cf27173}, intrahash = {f9ac4d1ab57568f81aa2b37beb459023}, journal = {Energy Environ. Sci.}, keywords = {bijel}, number = 6, pages = {1946-1971}, publisher = {The Royal Society of Chemistry}, timestamp = {2014-02-14T13:20:33.000+0100}, title = {A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00541J}, volume = 4, year = 2011 }