This article challenges the prevailing conception of judicial supremacy in comparative constitutional law as informed by U.S. and western models of constitution
Please log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).
Cite this publication
More citation styles
- please select -
%0 Report
%1 mate_judicial_2017
%A Mate, Manoj
%C Rochester, NY
%D 2017
%K Constitutionalism, Germany, africa, appointments, basic colombia, comparative constitutional doctrine, entrenchment, guardian, india, judicial law, south structure supremacy, turkey
%N ID 2955300
%T Judicial Supremacy in Comparative Constitutional Law
%U https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2955300
%X This article challenges the prevailing conception of judicial supremacy in comparative constitutional law as informed by U.S. and western models of constitution
@techreport{mate_judicial_2017,
abstract = {This article challenges the prevailing conception of judicial supremacy in comparative constitutional law as informed by U.S. and western models of constitution},
added-at = {2017-06-14T12:13:13.000+0200},
address = {Rochester, NY},
author = {Mate, Manoj},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/22dd84a71f2714175e2e48bba380ea116/mjvw},
file = {Snapshot:/home/matthijs/.zotero/zotero/4zaasxx8.default/zotero/storage/NWBZRIPN/papers.html:text/html},
institution = {Social Science Research Network},
interhash = {48fb1e41ff88dcdd191177c1f962f561},
intrahash = {2dd84a71f2714175e2e48bba380ea116},
keywords = {Constitutionalism, Germany, africa, appointments, basic colombia, comparative constitutional doctrine, entrenchment, guardian, india, judicial law, south structure supremacy, turkey},
month = apr,
number = {ID 2955300},
timestamp = {2017-06-14T12:20:58.000+0200},
title = {Judicial {Supremacy} in {Comparative} {Constitutional} {Law}},
type = {{SSRN} {Scholarly} {Paper}},
url = {https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2955300},
urldate = {2017-04-25},
year = 2017
}