%0 Journal Article %1 Morton2006 %A Morton, Lindsay M %A Cahill, Jack %A Hartge, Patricia %D 2006 %J American journal of epidemiology %K Bibliometrics DataCollection EpidemiologicResearchDesign Humans PatientSelection PeriodicalsasTopic PeriodicalsasTopic:statistics&numericaldata RefusaltoParticipate RefusaltoParticipate:psychology RefusaltoParticipate:statistics&numericaldat ReproducibilityofResults ResearchSubjects ResearchSubjects:psychology ResearchSubjects:supply&distribution RetrospectiveStudies SelectionBias TimeFactors %N 3 %P 197-203 %R 10.1093/aje/kwj036 %T Reporting participation in epidemiologic studies: a survey of practice. %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16339049 %V 163 %X Self-selection bias may threaten the internal validity of epidemiologic studies. Studies with a low level of participation are particularly vulnerable to this bias, and commentators note apparent declines in participation in recent years. The authors therefore conducted a retrospective review to survey the practice of reporting participation in epidemiologic studies, to assess changes in participation over time, and to evaluate the impact of increased biologic specimen collection on participation. The authors abstracted selected study characteristics from 355 peer-reviewed, original, analytic-epidemiology research articles published from January 1 to April 30, 2003, in 10 high-impact general epidemiology, public health, and medical journals. At least some information regarding participation was provided in 59% of cross-sectional studies, 44% of case-control studies, and 32% of cohort studies. Participation appears to have declined during 1970-2003 for all study designs. Participation declined most steeply for controls in population-based, case-control studies (-1.86% per year, 95% confidence interval: -3.03, -0.69), with steeper declines after 1990. Proportionately more studies collected biologic specimens over time, particularly for cohort and case-control study designs (p(trend) = 0.06 and 0.03, respectively), yet participation was reported separately for the biologic specimen study component in only 27% of studies. The authors conclude that epidemiologists need to address declining participation and to report participation consistently, including for biologic specimen collection.

@article{Morton2006, abstract = {Self-selection bias may threaten the internal validity of epidemiologic studies. Studies with a low level of participation are particularly vulnerable to this bias, and commentators note apparent declines in participation in recent years. The authors therefore conducted a retrospective review to survey the practice of reporting participation in epidemiologic studies, to assess changes in participation over time, and to evaluate the impact of increased biologic specimen collection on participation. The authors abstracted selected study characteristics from 355 peer-reviewed, original, analytic-epidemiology research articles published from January 1 to April 30, 2003, in 10 high-impact general epidemiology, public health, and medical journals. At least some information regarding participation was provided in 59% of cross-sectional studies, 44% of case-control studies, and 32% of cohort studies. Participation appears to have declined during 1970-2003 for all study designs. Participation declined most steeply for controls in population-based, case-control studies (-1.86% per year, 95% confidence interval: -3.03, -0.69), with steeper declines after 1990. Proportionately more studies collected biologic specimens over time, particularly for cohort and case-control study designs (p(trend) = 0.06 and 0.03, respectively), yet participation was reported separately for the biologic specimen study component in only 27% of studies. The authors conclude that epidemiologists need to address declining participation and to report participation consistently, including for biologic specimen collection.}, added-at = {2023-02-03T11:44:35.000+0100}, author = {Morton, Lindsay M and Cahill, Jack and Hartge, Patricia}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/27ee688ffacdbf2d3c874eed793481b88/jepcastel}, doi = {10.1093/aje/kwj036}, interhash = {77aa2cb046398d46a0e2c6efdf132549}, intrahash = {7ee688ffacdbf2d3c874eed793481b88}, issn = {0002-9262}, journal = {American journal of epidemiology}, keywords = {Bibliometrics DataCollection EpidemiologicResearchDesign Humans PatientSelection PeriodicalsasTopic PeriodicalsasTopic:statistics&numericaldata RefusaltoParticipate RefusaltoParticipate:psychology RefusaltoParticipate:statistics&numericaldat ReproducibilityofResults ResearchSubjects ResearchSubjects:psychology ResearchSubjects:supply&distribution RetrospectiveStudies SelectionBias TimeFactors}, month = {2}, note = {3993<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Generalització}, number = 3, pages = {197-203}, pmid = {16339049}, timestamp = {2023-02-03T11:44:35.000+0100}, title = {Reporting participation in epidemiologic studies: a survey of practice.}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16339049}, volume = 163, year = 2006 }