%0 Journal Article %1 Waszak:2005 %A Waszak, Florian %A Wascher, Edmund %A Keller, Peter %A Koch, Iring %A Aschersleben, Gisa %A Rosenbaum, David A. %A Prinz, Wolfgang %D 2005 %J Experimental Brain Research %K . Action Event-related P300 Reaction Readiness component potential %P 346?356 %R DOI 10.1007/s00221-004-2183-8 %T Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection %V 162 %X Human actions can be classified as being either more stimulus-based or more intention-based. According to the ideomotor framework of action control, intentionbased actions primarily refer to anticipated action effects (in other words response-stimulus R-S bindings), whereas stimulus-based actions are commonly assumed to be more strongly determined by stimulus-response SR bindings. We explored differences in the functional signatures of both modes of action control in a temporal bisection task. Participants either performed a choice response by pressing one out of two keys in response to a preceding stimulus (stimulus-based action), or pressed one out of two keys to produce the next stimulus (intentionbased action). In line with the ideomotor framework, we found intention-based actions to be shifted in time towards their anticipated effects (the next stimulus), whereas stimulus-based actions were shifted towards their preceding stimulus. Event-related potentials (ERPs) in the EEG revealed marked differences in action preparation for the two tasks. The data as a whole provide converging evidence for functional differences in the selection of motor actions as a function of their triggering conditions, and support the notion of two different modes of action selection, one being exogenous or mainly stimulus-driven, the other being endogenous or mainly intention-driven.

@article{Waszak:2005, abstract = {Human actions can be classified as being either more stimulus-based or more intention-based. According to the ideomotor framework of action control, intentionbased actions primarily refer to anticipated action effects (in other words response-stimulus [R-S] bindings), whereas stimulus-based actions are commonly assumed to be more strongly determined by stimulus-response [SR] bindings. We explored differences in the functional signatures of both modes of action control in a temporal bisection task. Participants either performed a choice response by pressing one out of two keys in response to a preceding stimulus (stimulus-based action), or pressed one out of two keys to produce the next stimulus (intentionbased action). In line with the ideomotor framework, we found intention-based actions to be shifted in time towards their anticipated effects (the next stimulus), whereas stimulus-based actions were shifted towards their preceding stimulus. Event-related potentials (ERPs) in the EEG revealed marked differences in action preparation for the two tasks. The data as a whole provide converging evidence for functional differences in the selection of motor actions as a function of their triggering conditions, and support the notion of two different modes of action selection, one being exogenous or mainly stimulus-driven, the other being endogenous or mainly intention-driven.}, added-at = {2009-06-26T15:25:19.000+0200}, author = {Waszak, Florian and Wascher, Edmund and Keller, Peter and Koch, Iring and Aschersleben, Gisa and Rosenbaum, David A. and Prinz, Wolfgang}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e0b4e574aba8ca6b75d74fab5e69c1cd/butz}, description = {diverse cognitive systems bib}, doi = {DOI 10.1007/s00221-004-2183-8}, interhash = {7b3402f99ec3a5e78f1aec6d87c625ad}, intrahash = {e0b4e574aba8ca6b75d74fab5e69c1cd}, journal = {Experimental Brain Research}, keywords = {. Action Event-related P300 Reaction Readiness component potential}, owner = {martin}, pages = {346?356}, timestamp = {2009-06-26T15:26:00.000+0200}, title = {Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection}, volume = 162, year = 2005 }