%0 Journal Article %1 winickoff_engaging_2015 %A Winickoff, David E. %A Flegal, Jane A. %A Asrat, Asfawossen %D 2015 %J Nature Climate Change %K Public attitudes %N 7 %P 627--634 %R 10.1038/nclimate2632 %T Engaging the Global South on climate engineering research %U https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate2632 %V 5 %X The Global South is relatively under-represented in public deliberations about solar radiation management (SRM), a controversial climate engineering concept. This Perspective analyses the outputs of a deliberative exercise about SRM, which took place at the University of California-Berkeley and involved 45 mid-career environmental leaders, 39 of whom were from the Global South. This analysis identifies and discusses four themes from the Berkeley workshop that might inform research and governance in this arena: (1) the 'moral hazard' problem should be reframed to emphasize 'moral responsibility'; (2) climate models of SRM deployment may not be credible as primary inputs to policy because they cannot sufficiently address local concerns such as access to water; (3) small outdoor experiments require some form of international public accountability; and (4) inclusion of actors from the Global South will strengthen both SRM research and governance.

@article{winickoff_engaging_2015, abstract = {The Global South is relatively under-represented in public deliberations about solar radiation management (SRM), a controversial climate engineering concept. This Perspective analyses the outputs of a deliberative exercise about SRM, which took place at the University of California-Berkeley and involved 45 mid-career environmental leaders, 39 of whom were from the Global South. This analysis identifies and discusses four themes from the Berkeley workshop that might inform research and governance in this arena: (1) the 'moral hazard' problem should be reframed to emphasize 'moral responsibility'; (2) climate models of SRM deployment may not be credible as primary inputs to policy because they cannot sufficiently address local concerns such as access to water; (3) small outdoor experiments require some form of international public accountability; and (4) inclusion of actors from the Global South will strengthen both SRM research and governance.}, added-at = {2018-12-12T20:35:48.000+0100}, author = {Winickoff, David E. and Flegal, Jane A. and Asrat, Asfawossen}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e0ebcc02b2c2e432b7ba6a36e30f50e4/climatemorrow}, copyright = {2015 Nature Publishing Group}, doi = {10.1038/nclimate2632}, file = {Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\dmorr\\Zotero\\storage\\UIAFNQ3J\\Winickoff et al. - 2015 - Engaging the Global South on climate engineering r.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\dmorr\\Zotero\\storage\\SYVA24BS\\nclimate2632.html:text/html}, interhash = {8a69acdd266eaaa894173528ed5933a1}, intrahash = {e0ebcc02b2c2e432b7ba6a36e30f50e4}, issn = {1758-6798}, journal = {Nature Climate Change}, keywords = {Public attitudes}, language = {en}, month = jul, number = 7, pages = {627--634}, timestamp = {2018-12-12T20:35:48.000+0100}, title = {Engaging the {Global} {South} on climate engineering research}, url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate2632}, urldate = {2018-09-04}, volume = 5, year = 2015 }