Article,

Nematode community structure in relation to soil and vegetation characteristics

, and .
Applied Soil Ecology, 1 (1): 29-44 (1994)

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that nematodes can contribute to an ecological soil classification, the nematode fauna of several Dutch terrestrial habitats was studied. A total of 209 samples from 44 nature reserves or slightly managed sites (n = 94) differing in vegetation (forest, shrubs, heathland, grassland) and soil type (clay, loam, sand) were studied. A selection of sites was studied over four seasons, and at one site variation in nematode fauna composition as a result of the selected sampling technique was studied. Nematodes extracted from bulk soil samples taken from the 0-10 cm depth mineral soil, and were identified to genus. Multivariate analysis techniques were used to classify the nematode samples into seven sample groups (SG) as described by soil characteristics in combination with the vegetation as follows: (1) SG A grasslands, dwarf-shrub vegetation and forest gaps on sandy soils; (2) SG B grasslands and forests on clayey soils; (3) SG C-D deciduous forests on sandy-loam soils; (4) SG E-F deciduous forests on sandy soils; (5) SG G coniferous forests on sandy soils. The nematode fauna of SG D-G were very similar, and were dominated by ten taxa: Acrobeloides, Aphelenchoides, Cephalenchus, Filenchus A, Filenchus B, Plectus A, Prismatolaimus, Rhabditidae, Tylolaimophorus and Wilsonema. Variation due to seasonal fluctuations and sampling technique, was small compared with differences in nematode fauna structure between different sites. The actual vegetation of some sites was not in agreement with the natural vegetation expected on 'site characteristics'. Analyses of the nematode fauna supported the observed inconsistencies between actual and natural vegetation. It was shown that for a range of terrestrial habitats nematode communities could be defined, and that these communities could be related to soil characteristics and vegetation.

Tags

Users

  • @pillo

Comments and Reviews