%0 Journal Article %1 khare2019forest %A Khare, Siddhartha %A Latifi, Hooman %A Rossi, Sergio %D 2019 %J Ecological Indicators %K article latifi lsfe %P 105520 %R https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105520 %T Forest beta-diversity analysis by remote sensing: How scale and sensors affect the Rao’s Q index %U http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X19305059 %V 106 %X Space-borne remote sensing missions provide robust, timely and continuous data to assess biodiversity in remote or protected areas, where direct field observations can be prohibited by difficult accessibility. The objective of this study was to extend the concept of remote sensing based assessment of beta-diversity to multi-scale domain by multi-resolution optical satellite data. This study was conducted in a reserved forest of western Himalaya, India; a region affected by the invasive Lantana camara L (lantana). We calculated and compared Rao’s Q and Shannon indices at different spatial resolutions (0.5, 5, and 30 m) and scales (window sizes) by using imageries from Pléiades 1A, RapidEye, and Landsat-8 acquired in April 2013, the pre-monsoon season. Rao’s Q index explained diversity more accurately than Shannon index for the three analyzed stand densities. Diversity was better approximated by Rao’s Q index calculated by Pléiades 1A at a resolution of 0.5 m at low stand density. We observed higher correlations of the average coefficient of variation (CV) with Rao’s Q and Shannon indices for areas associated with mixed spectral reflectance caused by overstory and understory vegetation. Furthermore, CV was lower in open areas dominated by lantana. These results indicated a strong scale and spatial resolution dependence of Rao’s Q index on remote sensing-derived spectral heterogeneity information. When applied in heterogeneous forest environments, Rao’s Q index could represent a better remote sensing proxy to estimate beta-diversity than the conventional Shannon index.

@article{khare2019forest, abstract = {Space-borne remote sensing missions provide robust, timely and continuous data to assess biodiversity in remote or protected areas, where direct field observations can be prohibited by difficult accessibility. The objective of this study was to extend the concept of remote sensing based assessment of beta-diversity to multi-scale domain by multi-resolution optical satellite data. This study was conducted in a reserved forest of western Himalaya, India; a region affected by the invasive Lantana camara L (lantana). We calculated and compared Rao’s Q and Shannon indices at different spatial resolutions (0.5, 5, and 30 m) and scales (window sizes) by using imageries from Pléiades 1A, RapidEye, and Landsat-8 acquired in April 2013, the pre-monsoon season. Rao’s Q index explained diversity more accurately than Shannon index for the three analyzed stand densities. Diversity was better approximated by Rao’s Q index calculated by Pléiades 1A at a resolution of 0.5 m at low stand density. We observed higher correlations of the average coefficient of variation (CV) with Rao’s Q and Shannon indices for areas associated with mixed spectral reflectance caused by overstory and understory vegetation. Furthermore, CV was lower in open areas dominated by lantana. These results indicated a strong scale and spatial resolution dependence of Rao’s Q index on remote sensing-derived spectral heterogeneity information. When applied in heterogeneous forest environments, Rao’s Q index could represent a better remote sensing proxy to estimate beta-diversity than the conventional Shannon index.}, added-at = {2021-01-03T13:21:22.000+0100}, author = {Khare, Siddhartha and Latifi, Hooman and Rossi, Sergio}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e8619c1fb6d0c6294c316da1469955d7/earthobs_uniwue}, description = {Forest beta-diversity analysis by remote sensing: How scale and sensors affect the Rao’s Q index - ScienceDirect}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105520}, interhash = {c417d057d8aab6ca0cf38e52ce4f3964}, intrahash = {e8619c1fb6d0c6294c316da1469955d7}, issn = {1470-160X}, journal = {Ecological Indicators}, keywords = {article latifi lsfe}, pages = 105520, timestamp = {2021-01-28T14:29:32.000+0100}, title = {Forest beta-diversity analysis by remote sensing: How scale and sensors affect the Rao’s Q index}, url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X19305059}, volume = 106, year = 2019 }