%0 Journal Article %1 RefWorks:402 %A Denny, Mark %D 1999 %J Canadian Journal of Physics %K Curling Curlingstein %N 11 %P 923-926 %T Reply to Comment on: Curling Rock Dynamics - The Motion of a Curling Rock: Inertial vs. Noninertial Reference Frames %V 77 %X In their comment, Shegelski and Reid (SR) question the validity ofthe approach adopted in my paper to calculate the motion ofa curling rock. Predictions of the motion of a curling rockfall into two categories: those that depend upon frictionalasymmetry and those that do not. Predictions in the firstcategory are discussed here and shown to contradict the resultsof SR. Predictions in the second category are shown to be notapplicable to the game of curling.

@article{RefWorks:402, abstract = {In their comment, Shegelski and Reid (SR) question the validity ofthe approach adopted in my paper to calculate the motion ofa curling rock. Predictions of the motion of a curling rockfall into two categories: those that depend upon frictionalasymmetry and those that do not. Predictions in the firstcategory are discussed here and shown to contradict the resultsof SR. Predictions in the second category are shown to be notapplicable to the game of curling.}, added-at = {2012-02-24T13:42:31.000+0100}, author = {Denny, Mark}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/273776c3894ab75e704734f0d8bac6fe3/cckonstanz}, interhash = {de3964a6b9123329d752170d6312e5aa}, intrahash = {73776c3894ab75e704734f0d8bac6fe3}, journal = {Canadian Journal of Physics}, keywords = {Curling Curlingstein}, month = Nov, note = {Editorial Material}, number = 11, pages = {923-926}, timestamp = {2012-10-16T10:49:53.000+0200}, title = {Reply to Comment on: Curling Rock Dynamics - The Motion of a Curling Rock: Inertial vs. Noninertial Reference Frames}, volume = 77, year = 1999 }