Аннотация
The term `habitat fragmentation' is often used inconsistently and
as a broad umbrella for many patterns and processes that accompany
landscape change. This has made it a panchreston or an explanation
or theory used in such a variety of ways as to become meaningless.
The panchreston problem has hampered efforts to understand and mitigate
the negative impacts of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity, and
has contributed to several largely unproductive debates. To overcome
the panchreston problem, we suggest that the focus of future work
needs to be specified more clearly within several key themes that
comprise the broad domain of habitat fragmentation. Here, we outline
three of these key themes and provide unambiguous terminology to
help overcome the panchreston problem.
Пользователи данного ресурса
Пожалуйста,
войдите в систему, чтобы принять участие в дискуссии (добавить собственные рецензию, или комментарий)