BRUSSELS—Tom Mortier received a message at work last year saying his 64-year-old mother had died the day before, and he quickly found out she'd been euthanized. Mr. Mortier, who teaches college chemistry, was shocked. Though estranged from his mother, he knew she was depressed and had spoken of euthanasia. But he had no idea this could happen, he said, especially since she wasn't physically ill, and her children weren't informed. "This is irreversible," he said. "One day my mother is dead." In the past 10 years since the country legalized the practice, more than 5,530 Belgians have signed up for ... FULL TEXT AVAILABLE VIA PROQUEST NEWSPAPERS DATABASE (FROM IALS/SAS)
PUTTE, Belgium—In this small village amid an array of Flemish farms, they were an unusual but seemingly happy pair, two 43-year-olds who were identical, deaf twins. Townspeople recalled seeing Marc and Eddy Verbessem around town frequently, talking animatedly in sign language together, tooling around in a small blue car, and regularly buying two copies of a popular gossip magazine. No one expected them to decide to die on purpose.
This article examines the reporting requirements in four jurisdictions in which assisted dying (euthanasia and/or assisted suicide) is legally regulated: the Netherlands, Belgium, Oregon and Switzerland. These jurisdictions were chosen because each had a substantial amount of empirical evidence available. We assess the available empirical evidence on reporting and what it tells us about the effectiveness of such requirements in encouraging reporting. We also look at the nature of requirements on regulatory bodies to refer cases not meeting the legal criteria to either prosecutorial or disciplinary authorities. We assess the evidence available on the outcomes of reported cases, including the rate of referral and the ultimate disposition of referred cases.