Article,

Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases

, and .
Science, 185 (4157): 1124-1131 (September 1974)
DOI: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

Abstract

This article described three heuristics that are employed in making judgements under uncertainty: (i) representativeness, which is usually employed when people are asked to judge the probability that an object or event A belongs to class or process B; (ii) availability of instances or scenarios, which is often employed when people are asked to assess the frequency of a class or the plausibility of a particular development; and (iii) adjustment from an anchor, which is usually employed in numerical prediction when a relevant value is available. These heuristics are highly economical and usually effective, but they lead to systematic and predictable errors. A better understanding of these heuristics and of the biases to which they lead could improve judgements and decisions in situations of uncertainty.

Tags

Users

  • @jkd
  • @mathias
  • @schultem
  • @machinelearning
  • @darkmatter
  • @josephausterwei

Comments and Reviews