With our work, we contribute towards a qualitative analysis of the discourse on controversies in online news media. For this, we employ Formal Concept Analysis and the economics of conventions to derive conceptual controversy maps. In our experiments, we analyze two maps from different news journals with methods from ordinal data science. We show how these methods can be used to assess the diversity, complexity and potential bias of controversies. In addition to that, we discuss how the diagrams of concept lattices can be used to navigate between news articles.
%0 Conference Paper
%1 10.1007/978-3-031-67868-4_14
%A Draude, Claude
%A Dürrschnabel, Dominik
%A Hirth, Johannes
%A Horn, Viktoria
%A Kropf, Jonathan
%A Lamla, Jörn
%A Stumme, Gerd
%A Uhlmann, Markus
%B Conceptual Knowledge Structures
%C Cham
%D 2024
%E Cabrera, Inma P.
%E Ferré, Sébastien
%E Obiedkov, Sergei
%I Springer Nature Switzerland
%K fca itegpub kde myown sai
%P 201--216
%T Conceptual Mapping of Controversies
%X With our work, we contribute towards a qualitative analysis of the discourse on controversies in online news media. For this, we employ Formal Concept Analysis and the economics of conventions to derive conceptual controversy maps. In our experiments, we analyze two maps from different news journals with methods from ordinal data science. We show how these methods can be used to assess the diversity, complexity and potential bias of controversies. In addition to that, we discuss how the diagrams of concept lattices can be used to navigate between news articles.
%@ 978-3-031-67868-4
@inproceedings{10.1007/978-3-031-67868-4_14,
abstract = {With our work, we contribute towards a qualitative analysis of the discourse on controversies in online news media. For this, we employ Formal Concept Analysis and the economics of conventions to derive conceptual controversy maps. In our experiments, we analyze two maps from different news journals with methods from ordinal data science. We show how these methods can be used to assess the diversity, complexity and potential bias of controversies. In addition to that, we discuss how the diagrams of concept lattices can be used to navigate between news articles.},
added-at = {2024-10-11T11:21:37.000+0200},
address = {Cham},
author = {Draude, Claude and Dürrschnabel, Dominik and Hirth, Johannes and Horn, Viktoria and Kropf, Jonathan and Lamla, J{\"o}rn and Stumme, Gerd and Uhlmann, Markus},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/28c35bc18259b038c3b82766cc1fd5a8b/hirth},
booktitle = {Conceptual Knowledge Structures},
editor = {Cabrera, Inma P. and Ferré, Sébastien and Obiedkov, Sergei},
interhash = {1ff49e0cf68a07ec67cbaaa7fb89f67f},
intrahash = {8c35bc18259b038c3b82766cc1fd5a8b},
isbn = {978-3-031-67868-4},
keywords = {fca itegpub kde myown sai},
pages = {201--216},
publisher = {Springer Nature Switzerland},
timestamp = {2024-11-18T14:25:05.000+0100},
title = {Conceptual Mapping of Controversies},
year = 2024
}