Classical knowledge representation methods have been successfully working for years with established – but in a way restricted and vague – relations such as synonymy, hierarchy (meronymy, hyponymy) and unspecified associations. Recent developments like ontologies and folksonomies show new forms of collaboration, indexing and knowledge representation and encourage the reconsideration of standard knowledge relationships for practical use. In a summarizing overview we show which relations are currently used in knowledge organization systems (controlled vocabularies, ontologies
and folksonomies) and which relations are expressed explicitly or which may be inherently hidden in them.
Пожалуйста, войдите в систему, чтобы принять участие в дискуссии (добавить собственные рецензию, или комментарий)
Цитировать эту публикацию
%0 Journal Article
%1 peters-paradigmatic-2008
%A Peters, Isabella
%A Weller, Katrin
%D 2008
%J Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis
%K knowledge_organization_system paradigmatic relations syntagmatic term
%N 2
%P 100-107
%T Paradigmatic and Syntagmatic Relations in Knowledge Organization Systems
%U http://www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/infowiss/admin/public_dateien/files/56/1204547334paradigmat.pdf
%V 59
%X Classical knowledge representation methods have been successfully working for years with established – but in a way restricted and vague – relations such as synonymy, hierarchy (meronymy, hyponymy) and unspecified associations. Recent developments like ontologies and folksonomies show new forms of collaboration, indexing and knowledge representation and encourage the reconsideration of standard knowledge relationships for practical use. In a summarizing overview we show which relations are currently used in knowledge organization systems (controlled vocabularies, ontologies
and folksonomies) and which relations are expressed explicitly or which may be inherently hidden in them.
@article{peters-paradigmatic-2008,
abstract = {Classical knowledge representation methods have been successfully working for years with established – but in a way restricted and vague – relations such as synonymy, hierarchy (meronymy, hyponymy) and unspecified associations. Recent developments like ontologies and folksonomies show new forms of collaboration, indexing and knowledge representation and encourage the reconsideration of standard knowledge relationships for practical use. In a summarizing overview we show which relations are currently used in knowledge organization systems (controlled vocabularies, ontologies
and folksonomies) and which relations are expressed explicitly or which may be inherently hidden in them.},
added-at = {2011-02-02T13:57:49.000+0100},
author = {Peters, Isabella and Weller, Katrin},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/21b50e5ab8fc21f94bd512b012df69ec8/dbenz},
interhash = {12015b43edecb45bae1b3e62a393340b},
intrahash = {1b50e5ab8fc21f94bd512b012df69ec8},
journal = {Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis},
keywords = {knowledge_organization_system paradigmatic relations syntagmatic term},
number = 2,
pages = {100-107},
timestamp = {2013-07-31T15:39:42.000+0200},
title = {Paradigmatic and Syntagmatic Relations in Knowledge Organization Systems},
url = {http://www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/infowiss/admin/public_dateien/files/56/1204547334paradigmat.pdf},
volume = 59,
year = 2008
}