Аннотация
To compare and evaluate the microleakage in class V cavity filled with flowable composite resin, glass ionomer cement and cention n. Materials and Methodology -Class V cavities were prepared in 30 freshly extracted teeth. Teeth were randomly assigned into three experimental groups (n = 10).Group 1 -Restored with Flowable Composite .Group 2-Restored with Glass Ionomer Cement.Group 3- Restored with Cention N. All the specimens were subjected to thermocycling. Specimens were stained with 0.1% Methylene Blue Dye and evaluated for dye penetration under stereomicroscope. Results - According to the results, Group 1 (Flowable composite) exhibited the highest micro leakage followed by Group 2(Glass Ionomer) and least microleakage was shown by Group 3(Cention N). Conclusion- All materials showed some microleakage at the cervical margin of restoration. However, Group 3(Cention N) exhibited lowest microleakage .
Пользователи данного ресурса
Пожалуйста,
войдите в систему, чтобы принять участие в дискуссии (добавить собственные рецензию, или комментарий)