%0 Journal Article %1 vanheuvelen2017unequal %A VanHeuvelen, Tom %D 2017 %J Social Science Research %K 2017 FDZ_IUP ISSP ISSP_input2016 SCOPUSindexed SSCIindexed article checked comparative_sociology english historical_sociology indexproved input2016 political_sociology review_proved reviewed support_for_redistribution %P 43-66 %T Unequal views of inequality: Cross-national support for redistribution 1985–2011. %U http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X16301715 %V 64 %X This research examines public views on government responsibility to reduce income inequality, support for redistribution. While individual-level correlates of support for redistribution are relatively well understood, many questions remain at the country-level. Therefore, I examine how country-level characteristics affect aggregate support for redistribution. I test explanations of aggregate support using a unique dataset combining 18 waves of the International Social Survey Programme and European Social Survey. Results from mixed-effects logistic regression and fixed-effects linear regression models show two primary and contrasting effects. States that reduce inequality through bundles of tax and transfer policies are rewarded with more supportive publics. In contrast, economic development has a seemingly equivalent and dampening effect on public support. Importantly, the effect of economic development grows at higher levels of development, potentially overwhelming the amplifying eff

@article{vanheuvelen2017unequal, abstract = {This research examines public views on government responsibility to reduce income inequality, support for redistribution. While individual-level correlates of support for redistribution are relatively well understood, many questions remain at the country-level. Therefore, I examine how country-level characteristics affect aggregate support for redistribution. I test explanations of aggregate support using a unique dataset combining 18 waves of the International Social Survey Programme and European Social Survey. Results from mixed-effects logistic regression and fixed-effects linear regression models show two primary and contrasting effects. States that reduce inequality through bundles of tax and transfer policies are rewarded with more supportive publics. In contrast, economic development has a seemingly equivalent and dampening effect on public support. Importantly, the effect of economic development grows at higher levels of development, potentially overwhelming the amplifying eff}, added-at = {2019-03-20T18:49:19.000+0100}, author = {VanHeuvelen, Tom}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/28124deb10726e26dd19b9d6183e8e718/gesis_dump}, interhash = {1755de398f133d6d254cbff3c5b1c166}, intrahash = {8124deb10726e26dd19b9d6183e8e718}, issn = {0049-089X}, journal = {Social Science Research}, keywords = {2017 FDZ_IUP ISSP ISSP_input2016 SCOPUSindexed SSCIindexed article checked comparative_sociology english historical_sociology indexproved input2016 political_sociology review_proved reviewed support_for_redistribution}, note = {First published online: November 2, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.10.010. (ISSP)}, pages = {43-66}, tagadata-svko-dda-test = {11141}, tagadata-svkoddatest2 = {11134}, timestamp = {2019-10-01T13:01:53.000+0200}, title = {Unequal views of inequality: Cross-national support for redistribution 1985–2011.}, url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X16301715}, volume = 64, year = 2017 }