G. Gigerenzer. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33 (5):
587-606(November 2004)7199<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Bons exemples d'interpretacions (errònies!) del valor p i de les idees de Fisher i Neyman-Pearson<m:linebreak></m:linebreak> <m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Significació estadística; Interpretació de resultats; Introductori.
DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.033
Zusammenfassung
Statistical rituals largely eliminate statistical thinking in the social sciences. Rituals are indispensable for identification with social groups, but they should be the subject rather than the procedure of science. What I call the “null ritual” consists of three steps: (1) set up a statistical null hypothesis, but do not specify your own hypothesis nor any alternative hypothesis, (2) use the 5% significance level for rejecting the null and accepting your hypothesis, and (3) always perform this procedure. I report evidence of the resulting collective confusion and fears about sanctions on the part of students and teachers, researchers and editors, as well as textbook writers.
7199<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Bons exemples d'interpretacions (errònies!) del valor p i de les idees de Fisher i Neyman-Pearson<m:linebreak></m:linebreak> <m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Significació estadística; Interpretació de resultats; Introductori
%0 Journal Article
%1 Gigerenzer2004
%A Gigerenzer, Gerd
%D 2004
%J The Journal of Socio-Economics
%K Collectiveillusions Rituals Statisticalsignifi
%N 5
%P 587-606
%R 10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.033
%T Mindless statistics
%U http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053535704000927 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053535704000927
%V 33
%X Statistical rituals largely eliminate statistical thinking in the social sciences. Rituals are indispensable for identification with social groups, but they should be the subject rather than the procedure of science. What I call the “null ritual” consists of three steps: (1) set up a statistical null hypothesis, but do not specify your own hypothesis nor any alternative hypothesis, (2) use the 5% significance level for rejecting the null and accepting your hypothesis, and (3) always perform this procedure. I report evidence of the resulting collective confusion and fears about sanctions on the part of students and teachers, researchers and editors, as well as textbook writers.
%@ 1053-5357
@article{Gigerenzer2004,
abstract = {Statistical rituals largely eliminate statistical thinking in the social sciences. Rituals are indispensable for identification with social groups, but they should be the subject rather than the procedure of science. What I call the “null ritual” consists of three steps: (1) set up a statistical null hypothesis, but do not specify your own hypothesis nor any alternative hypothesis, (2) use the 5% significance level for rejecting the null and accepting your hypothesis, and (3) always perform this procedure. I report evidence of the resulting collective confusion and fears about sanctions on the part of students and teachers, researchers and editors, as well as textbook writers.},
added-at = {2023-02-03T11:44:35.000+0100},
author = {Gigerenzer, Gerd},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2eb1abc44ea1329fdfd5113ecd390fe24/jepcastel},
doi = {10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.033},
interhash = {84469793bd83f491165aadfd135af11f},
intrahash = {eb1abc44ea1329fdfd5113ecd390fe24},
isbn = {1053-5357},
issn = {10535357},
journal = {The Journal of Socio-Economics},
keywords = {Collectiveillusions Rituals Statisticalsignifi},
month = {11},
note = {7199<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Bons exemples d'interpretacions (errònies!) del valor p i de les idees de Fisher i Neyman-Pearson<m:linebreak></m:linebreak> <m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Significació estadística; Interpretació de resultats; Introductori},
number = 5,
pages = {587-606},
timestamp = {2023-02-03T11:44:35.000+0100},
title = {Mindless statistics},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053535704000927 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053535704000927},
volume = 33,
year = 2004
}