The complexity of knowledge construction in a classroom setting
T. Dreyfus, C. Rasmussen, N. Apkarian, and M. Tabach. INDRUM 2018, (2018)"The complexity of knowledge flow in the classroom, even based on this one class session, is far greater than one might imagine. ".
Abstract
We study a class of mathematics education MA students in an introductory course on
Chaos and Fractals, as they grapple with the Sierpinksi triangle, and in particular
with the apparent paradox that its area equals 0, while its perimeter is infinitely long.
For this purpose, we network an approach for investigating the construction of
knowledge in small groups with one for examining how ideas and ways of reasoning
function-as-if-shared in a classroom. Our results show complexities: (i) small group
work and whole class discussions mutually influence each other; (ii) ideas may
function-as-if-shared in the whole class even if the majority of students have not
previously constructed them in their groups; (iii) knowledge constructed in the small
groups may or may not later function-as-if-shared in the whole class.
%0 Conference Paper
%1 dreyfus2018complexity
%A Dreyfus, Tommy
%A Rasmussen, Chris
%A Apkarian, Naneh
%A Tabach, Michal
%B INDRUM 2018
%D 2018
%K AiC abstraction complexity context epistemic learning mathematics practices
%T The complexity of knowledge construction in a classroom setting
%U https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01849971/
%X We study a class of mathematics education MA students in an introductory course on
Chaos and Fractals, as they grapple with the Sierpinksi triangle, and in particular
with the apparent paradox that its area equals 0, while its perimeter is infinitely long.
For this purpose, we network an approach for investigating the construction of
knowledge in small groups with one for examining how ideas and ways of reasoning
function-as-if-shared in a classroom. Our results show complexities: (i) small group
work and whole class discussions mutually influence each other; (ii) ideas may
function-as-if-shared in the whole class even if the majority of students have not
previously constructed them in their groups; (iii) knowledge constructed in the small
groups may or may not later function-as-if-shared in the whole class.
@inproceedings{dreyfus2018complexity,
abstract = {We study a class of mathematics education MA students in an introductory course on
Chaos and Fractals, as they grapple with the Sierpinksi triangle, and in particular
with the apparent paradox that its area equals 0, while its perimeter is infinitely long.
For this purpose, we network an approach for investigating the construction of
knowledge in small groups with one for examining how ideas and ways of reasoning
function-as-if-shared in a classroom. Our results show complexities: (i) small group
work and whole class discussions mutually influence each other; (ii) ideas may
function-as-if-shared in the whole class even if the majority of students have not
previously constructed them in their groups; (iii) knowledge constructed in the small
groups may or may not later function-as-if-shared in the whole class.
},
added-at = {2018-12-17T18:07:09.000+0100},
author = {Dreyfus, Tommy and Rasmussen, Chris and Apkarian, Naneh and Tabach, Michal},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/24039df0b77f32d2c303dfff8cd0e306c/yish},
booktitle = {INDRUM 2018},
interhash = {63bedbe9b431ed3a99024851759a28c0},
intrahash = {4039df0b77f32d2c303dfff8cd0e306c},
keywords = {AiC abstraction complexity context epistemic learning mathematics practices},
note = {"The complexity of knowledge flow in the classroom, even based on this one class session, is far greater than one might imagine. "},
timestamp = {2018-12-17T18:07:09.000+0100},
title = {The complexity of knowledge construction in a classroom setting},
url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01849971/},
year = 2018
}