%0 Journal Article %1 Yang2020 %A Yang, Li-Chia %A Lerch, Alexander %D 2020 %J Neural Computing and Applications %K evaluation %N 9 %P 4773--4784 %R 10.1007/s00521-018-3849-7 %T On the evaluation of generative models in music %U https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3849-7 %V 32 %X The modeling of artificial, human-level creativity is becoming more and more achievable. In recent years, neural networks have been successfully applied to different tasks such as image and music generation, demonstrating their great potential in realizing computational creativity. The fuzzy definition of creativity combined with varying goals of the evaluated generative systems, however, makes subjective evaluation seem to be the only viable methodology of choice. We review the evaluation of generative music systems and discuss the inherent challenges of their evaluation. Although subjective evaluation should always be the ultimate choice for the evaluation of creative results, researchers unfamiliar with rigorous subjective experiment design and without the necessary resources for the execution of a large-scale experiment face challenges in terms of reliability, validity, and replicability of the results. In numerous studies, this leads to the report of insignificant and possibly irrelevant results and the lack of comparability with similar and previous generative systems. Therefore, we propose a set of simple musically informed objective metrics enabling an objective and reproducible way of evaluating and comparing the output of music generative systems. We demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed metrics with several experiments on real-world data.

@article{Yang2020, abstract = {The modeling of artificial, human-level creativity is becoming more and more achievable. In recent years, neural networks have been successfully applied to different tasks such as image and music generation, demonstrating their great potential in realizing computational creativity. The fuzzy definition of creativity combined with varying goals of the evaluated generative systems, however, makes subjective evaluation seem to be the only viable methodology of choice. We review the evaluation of generative music systems and discuss the inherent challenges of their evaluation. Although subjective evaluation should always be the ultimate choice for the evaluation of creative results, researchers unfamiliar with rigorous subjective experiment design and without the necessary resources for the execution of a large-scale experiment face challenges in terms of reliability, validity, and replicability of the results. In numerous studies, this leads to the report of insignificant and possibly irrelevant results and the lack of comparability with similar and previous generative systems. Therefore, we propose a set of simple musically informed objective metrics enabling an objective and reproducible way of evaluating and comparing the output of music generative systems. We demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed metrics with several experiments on real-world data.}, added-at = {2023-04-05T17:07:15.000+0200}, author = {Yang, Li-Chia and Lerch, Alexander}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2602dd92bfaaddf97644b465a70c0a560/alex_h}, day = 01, description = {On the evaluation of generative models in music | SpringerLink}, doi = {10.1007/s00521-018-3849-7}, interhash = {24aff7701d4daec8872eca1ba3064423}, intrahash = {602dd92bfaaddf97644b465a70c0a560}, issn = {1433-3058}, journal = {Neural Computing and Applications}, keywords = {evaluation}, month = may, number = 9, pages = {4773--4784}, timestamp = {2023-04-05T17:07:15.000+0200}, title = {On the evaluation of generative models in music}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3849-7}, volume = 32, year = 2020 }