The present article reviews and distinguishes 3 related but different types of significance: “statistical,” “practical,” and “clinical.” A framework for conceptualizing the many “practical” effect size indices is described. Several effect size indices that counseling researchers can use, or that counselors reading the literature may encounter, are summarized. A way of estimating “corrected” intervention effects is proposed. It is suggested that readers should expect authors to report indices of “practical” or “clinical” significance, or both, within their research reports; and it is noted that indeed some journals now require such reports.
%0 Journal Article
%1 Thompson2002
%A Thompson, Bruce
%D 2002
%J Journal of Counseling & Development
%K imported
%N 1
%P 64-71
%R 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2002.tb00167.x
%T “Statistical,” “Practical,” and “Clinical”: How Many Kinds of Significance Do Counselors Need to Consider?
%U http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2002.tb00167.x
%V 80
%X The present article reviews and distinguishes 3 related but different types of significance: “statistical,” “practical,” and “clinical.” A framework for conceptualizing the many “practical” effect size indices is described. Several effect size indices that counseling researchers can use, or that counselors reading the literature may encounter, are summarized. A way of estimating “corrected” intervention effects is proposed. It is suggested that readers should expect authors to report indices of “practical” or “clinical” significance, or both, within their research reports; and it is noted that indeed some journals now require such reports.
@article{Thompson2002,
abstract = {The present article reviews and distinguishes 3 related but different types of significance: “statistical,” “practical,” and “clinical.” A framework for conceptualizing the many “practical” effect size indices is described. Several effect size indices that counseling researchers can use, or that counselors reading the literature may encounter, are summarized. A way of estimating “corrected” intervention effects is proposed. It is suggested that readers should expect authors to report indices of “practical” or “clinical” significance, or both, within their research reports; and it is noted that indeed some journals now require such reports.},
added-at = {2023-02-03T11:44:35.000+0100},
author = {Thompson, Bruce},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/26fea1ea5b5db329218077fbdb068c821/jepcastel},
doi = {10.1002/j.1556-6678.2002.tb00167.x},
interhash = {d5b17ed6096ba1b484a862ccc1384f26},
intrahash = {6fea1ea5b5db329218077fbdb068c821},
issn = {07489633},
journal = {Journal of Counseling & Development},
keywords = {imported},
month = {1},
note = {Tamaño del efecto; Significació estadística; MDCI},
number = 1,
pages = {64-71},
timestamp = {2023-02-03T11:44:35.000+0100},
title = {“Statistical,” “Practical,” and “Clinical”: How Many Kinds of Significance Do Counselors Need to Consider?},
url = {http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2002.tb00167.x},
volume = 80,
year = 2002
}