New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation
H. Moed. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, (2009)10.1007/s00005-009-0001-5.
Abstract
This paper presents an overview of research assessment methodologies developed in the field of evaluative bibliometrics, a subfield of quantitative science and technology studies, aimed to construct indicators of research performance from a quantitative statistical analysis of scientific-scholarly documents. Citation analysis is one of its key methodologies. The paper illustrates the potentialities and limitations of the use of bibliometric indicators in research assessment. It discusses the relationship between metrics and peer review; databases used as sources of bibliometric analysis; the pros and cons of indicators often applied, including journal impact factors, Hirsch indices, and normalized indicators of citation impact; and approaches to the bibliometric measurement of institutional research performance.
%0 Journal Article
%1 newbiblio2009
%A Moed, Henk
%D 2009
%I Birkhäuser Basel
%J Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
%K bibliometrie citation idp zitationsanalyse
%P 13-18
%T New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation
%U http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00005-009-0001-5
%V 57
%X This paper presents an overview of research assessment methodologies developed in the field of evaluative bibliometrics, a subfield of quantitative science and technology studies, aimed to construct indicators of research performance from a quantitative statistical analysis of scientific-scholarly documents. Citation analysis is one of its key methodologies. The paper illustrates the potentialities and limitations of the use of bibliometric indicators in research assessment. It discusses the relationship between metrics and peer review; databases used as sources of bibliometric analysis; the pros and cons of indicators often applied, including journal impact factors, Hirsch indices, and normalized indicators of citation impact; and approaches to the bibliometric measurement of institutional research performance.
@article{newbiblio2009,
abstract = {This paper presents an overview of research assessment methodologies developed in the field of evaluative bibliometrics, a subfield of quantitative science and technology studies, aimed to construct indicators of research performance from a quantitative statistical analysis of scientific-scholarly documents. Citation analysis is one of its key methodologies. The paper illustrates the potentialities and limitations of the use of bibliometric indicators in research assessment. It discusses the relationship between metrics and peer review; databases used as sources of bibliometric analysis; the pros and cons of indicators often applied, including journal impact factors, Hirsch indices, and normalized indicators of citation impact; and approaches to the bibliometric measurement of institutional research performance.},
added-at = {2011-05-25T19:50:15.000+0200},
affiliation = {Leiden University Center for Science and Technology Studies Leiden the Netherlands},
author = {Moed, Henk},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/289bdf7af93f0dc66d0e92618bf485026/kw},
interhash = {2d380c4871790fcbb273ead2ae9abdea},
intrahash = {89bdf7af93f0dc66d0e92618bf485026},
issn = {0004-069X},
issue = {1},
journal = {Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis},
keyword = {Medicine},
keywords = {bibliometrie citation idp zitationsanalyse},
note = {10.1007/s00005-009-0001-5},
pages = {13-18},
publisher = {Birkhäuser Basel},
timestamp = {2011-05-25T19:50:15.000+0200},
title = {New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00005-009-0001-5},
volume = 57,
year = 2009
}