A line of transmission towers extending from Anchorage to Fairbanks ,
Alaska has been designed using a highly flexible X frame. A s upporting
structure which can "give " and redistribute the heavy wind and ice loading
has long been recognized to be efficient in this e nvironment. This
structure has posed a difficult analytical problem because it has a
pinned base and is guyed with a load balancing yoke on each side. The
configuration of the legs and the s lende r members which are typically
used , make the structure susceptible to buckling. Despite these problems ,
the structure has a habit of standing up without its required analytical
foundation .
Because of the problems associated with the structure , it was decided
to s tudy the tower ' s behavior before a detailed analysis was required
for bidding . The Union Metal Manufacturing Company felt that a
nonlinear analysis of this structure would add to the credibility of their
proposal to fabricate these towers . Some staff members had some previous
experience with this type of tower and had seen full scale tests . They
were able to add some insight in setting up the finite element model.
Two approaches using ANSYS were considered and compared to verify
the results. The first was a large displacement analysis with stress
stiffening and initial strain. The second was a slow dynamics ana1ysis
to handle the ins tabilities due to the guyed support system . Both of
these approaches produced reasonable results which will be discussed in
this paper .
%0 Journal Article
%1 desantis1983large
%A DeSantis, Philip
%A Long, Robert
%D 1983
%K ANALYSIS Tower Transmission
%T LARGE DISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS OF GUYED X TRANSMISSION
TOWERS
%X A line of transmission towers extending from Anchorage to Fairbanks ,
Alaska has been designed using a highly flexible X frame. A s upporting
structure which can "give " and redistribute the heavy wind and ice loading
has long been recognized to be efficient in this e nvironment. This
structure has posed a difficult analytical problem because it has a
pinned base and is guyed with a load balancing yoke on each side. The
configuration of the legs and the s lende r members which are typically
used , make the structure susceptible to buckling. Despite these problems ,
the structure has a habit of standing up without its required analytical
foundation .
Because of the problems associated with the structure , it was decided
to s tudy the tower ' s behavior before a detailed analysis was required
for bidding . The Union Metal Manufacturing Company felt that a
nonlinear analysis of this structure would add to the credibility of their
proposal to fabricate these towers . Some staff members had some previous
experience with this type of tower and had seen full scale tests . They
were able to add some insight in setting up the finite element model.
Two approaches using ANSYS were considered and compared to verify
the results. The first was a large displacement analysis with stress
stiffening and initial strain. The second was a slow dynamics ana1ysis
to handle the ins tabilities due to the guyed support system . Both of
these approaches produced reasonable results which will be discussed in
this paper .
@article{desantis1983large,
abstract = {A line of transmission towers extending from Anchorage to Fairbanks ,
Alaska has been designed using a highly flexible X frame. A s upporting
structure which can "give " and redistribute the heavy wind and ice loading
has long been recognized to be efficient in this e nvironment. This
structure has posed a difficult analytical problem because it has a
pinned base and is guyed with a load balancing yoke on each side. The
configuration of the legs and the s lende r members which are typically
used , make the structure susceptible to buckling. Despite these problems ,
the structure has a habit of standing up without its required analytical
foundation .
Because of the problems associated with the structure , it was decided
to s tudy the tower ' s behavior before a detailed analysis was required
for bidding . The Union Metal Manufacturing Company felt that a
nonlinear analysis of this structure would add to the credibility of their
proposal to fabricate these towers . Some staff members had some previous
experience with this type of tower and had seen full scale tests . They
were able to add some insight in setting up the finite element model.
Two approaches using ANSYS were considered and compared to verify
the results. The first was a large displacement analysis with stress
stiffening and initial strain. The second was a slow dynamics ana1ysis
to handle the ins tabilities due to the guyed support system . Both of
these approaches produced reasonable results which will be discussed in
this paper .},
added-at = {2020-04-08T20:07:49.000+0200},
author = {DeSantis, Philip and Long, Robert},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/29b1e19d0f0789efbfe44f332715b7a91/ceps},
interhash = {feed3fe72c602486da184ac3a3a2b104},
intrahash = {9b1e19d0f0789efbfe44f332715b7a91},
keywords = {ANALYSIS Tower Transmission},
timestamp = {2023-12-21T15:05:58.000+0100},
title = {LARGE DISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS OF GUYED X TRANSMISSION
TOWERS},
year = 1983
}