OBJECTIVES: To model the steps involved in preparing for and carrying out propensity score analyses by providing step-by-step guidance and Stata code applied to an empirical dataset. STUDY DESIGN: Guidance, Stata code, and empirical examples are given to illustrate (1) the process of choosing variables to include in the propensity score; (2) balance of propensity score across treatment and comparison groups; (3) balance of covariates across treatment and comparison groups within blocks of the propensity score; (4) choice of matching and weighting strategies; (5) balance of covariates after matching or weighting the sample; and (6) interpretation of treatment effect estimates. EMPIRICAL APPLICATION: We use data from the Palliative Care for Cancer Patients (PC4C) study, a multisite observational study of the effect of inpatient palliative care on patient health outcomes and health services use, to illustrate the development and use of a propensity score. CONCLUSIONS: Propensity scores are one useful tool for accounting for observed differences between treated and comparison groups. Careful testing of propensity scores is required before using them to estimate treatment effects.
%0 Journal Article
%1 Garrido2014
%A Garrido, Melissa M
%A Kelley, Amy S
%A Paris, Julia
%A Roza, Katherine
%A Meier, Diane E
%A Morrison, R Sean
%A Aldridge, Melissa D
%D 2014
%J Health services research
%K 80andover Adult Aged CancerCareFacilities CancerCareFacilities:statistics&numericaldat ConfoundingFactors(Epidemiology) DataInterpretation Female Humans Male MiddleAged Models Neoplasms Neoplasms:epidemiology NewYork Ohio OutcomeAssessment(HealthCare) OutcomeAssessment(HealthCare):methods PalliativeCare PalliativeCare:statistics&numericaldata Pennsylvania PropensityScore ResearchDesign Statistical TreatmentOutcome Virginia Wisconsin YoungAdult
%N 5
%P 1701-20
%R 10.1111/1475-6773.12182
%T Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores.
%U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24779867
%V 49
%X OBJECTIVES: To model the steps involved in preparing for and carrying out propensity score analyses by providing step-by-step guidance and Stata code applied to an empirical dataset. STUDY DESIGN: Guidance, Stata code, and empirical examples are given to illustrate (1) the process of choosing variables to include in the propensity score; (2) balance of propensity score across treatment and comparison groups; (3) balance of covariates across treatment and comparison groups within blocks of the propensity score; (4) choice of matching and weighting strategies; (5) balance of covariates after matching or weighting the sample; and (6) interpretation of treatment effect estimates. EMPIRICAL APPLICATION: We use data from the Palliative Care for Cancer Patients (PC4C) study, a multisite observational study of the effect of inpatient palliative care on patient health outcomes and health services use, to illustrate the development and use of a propensity score. CONCLUSIONS: Propensity scores are one useful tool for accounting for observed differences between treated and comparison groups. Careful testing of propensity scores is required before using them to estimate treatment effects.
@article{Garrido2014,
abstract = {OBJECTIVES: To model the steps involved in preparing for and carrying out propensity score analyses by providing step-by-step guidance and Stata code applied to an empirical dataset. STUDY DESIGN: Guidance, Stata code, and empirical examples are given to illustrate (1) the process of choosing variables to include in the propensity score; (2) balance of propensity score across treatment and comparison groups; (3) balance of covariates across treatment and comparison groups within blocks of the propensity score; (4) choice of matching and weighting strategies; (5) balance of covariates after matching or weighting the sample; and (6) interpretation of treatment effect estimates. EMPIRICAL APPLICATION: We use data from the Palliative Care for Cancer Patients (PC4C) study, a multisite observational study of the effect of inpatient palliative care on patient health outcomes and health services use, to illustrate the development and use of a propensity score. CONCLUSIONS: Propensity scores are one useful tool for accounting for observed differences between treated and comparison groups. Careful testing of propensity scores is required before using them to estimate treatment effects.},
added-at = {2023-02-03T11:44:35.000+0100},
author = {Garrido, Melissa M and Kelley, Amy S and Paris, Julia and Roza, Katherine and Meier, Diane E and Morrison, R Sean and Aldridge, Melissa D},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e7fc0acf1bc029b32586ec2c37ca603e/jepcastel},
doi = {10.1111/1475-6773.12182},
interhash = {b88920b8facf6103046b4bcf47a358ae},
intrahash = {e7fc0acf1bc029b32586ec2c37ca603e},
issn = {1475-6773},
journal = {Health services research},
keywords = {80andover Adult Aged CancerCareFacilities CancerCareFacilities:statistics&numericaldat ConfoundingFactors(Epidemiology) DataInterpretation Female Humans Male MiddleAged Models Neoplasms Neoplasms:epidemiology NewYork Ohio OutcomeAssessment(HealthCare) OutcomeAssessment(HealthCare):methods PalliativeCare PalliativeCare:statistics&numericaldata Pennsylvania PropensityScore ResearchDesign Statistical TreatmentOutcome Virginia Wisconsin YoungAdult},
month = {10},
note = {Propensity score; STATA; Introductori; Anàlisi de dades},
number = 5,
pages = {1701-20},
pmid = {24779867},
timestamp = {2023-02-03T11:44:35.000+0100},
title = {Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores.},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24779867},
volume = 49,
year = 2014
}