This article challenges the prevailing conception of judicial supremacy in comparative constitutional law as informed by U.S. and western models of constitution
Пожалуйста, войдите в систему, чтобы принять участие в дискуссии (добавить собственные рецензию, или комментарий)
Цитировать эту публикацию
%0 Report
%1 mate_judicial_2017
%A Mate, Manoj
%C Rochester, NY
%D 2017
%K Constitutionalism, Germany, africa, appointments, basic colombia, comparative constitutional doctrine, entrenchment, guardian, india, judicial law, south structure supremacy, turkey
%N ID 2955300
%T Judicial Supremacy in Comparative Constitutional Law
%U https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2955300
%X This article challenges the prevailing conception of judicial supremacy in comparative constitutional law as informed by U.S. and western models of constitution
@techreport{mate_judicial_2017,
abstract = {This article challenges the prevailing conception of judicial supremacy in comparative constitutional law as informed by U.S. and western models of constitution},
added-at = {2017-06-14T12:13:13.000+0200},
address = {Rochester, NY},
author = {Mate, Manoj},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/22dd84a71f2714175e2e48bba380ea116/mjvw},
file = {Snapshot:/home/matthijs/.zotero/zotero/4zaasxx8.default/zotero/storage/NWBZRIPN/papers.html:text/html},
institution = {Social Science Research Network},
interhash = {48fb1e41ff88dcdd191177c1f962f561},
intrahash = {2dd84a71f2714175e2e48bba380ea116},
keywords = {Constitutionalism, Germany, africa, appointments, basic colombia, comparative constitutional doctrine, entrenchment, guardian, india, judicial law, south structure supremacy, turkey},
month = apr,
number = {ID 2955300},
timestamp = {2017-06-14T12:20:58.000+0200},
title = {Judicial {Supremacy} in {Comparative} {Constitutional} {Law}},
type = {{SSRN} {Scholarly} {Paper}},
url = {https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2955300},
urldate = {2017-04-25},
year = 2017
}