Abstract
Magnetometer data from Galileo's close encounters with lo on October
11, 1999, and February 22, 2000, do not establish clearly either
the existence or absence of an internal magnetic moment because they
were acquired in regions where plasma currents contribute large magnetic
perturbations. Data from an additional encounter on November 26,
1999, with closest approach beneath lo's south polar regions, were
lost. The recent passes add to our understanding of the interaction
of the torus with lo and its flux tube and tighten the limits on
possible internal sources of magnetic fields. Simple field-draping
arguments account for some aspects of the observed rotations. Interpretations
in terms of both a magnetized and an unmagnetized lo are considered.
Data from the February 2000 pass (closest approach altitude 201 km,
latitude 18 degrees) rule out a strongly magnetized lo (surface equatorial
field larger than the background field) but do not rule out a weakly
magnetized lo (surface equatorial field of the order of Ganymede's
but smaller than the background field at Io). Models suggest that
if Io is magnetized, its magnetic moment is not strictly antialigned
with the rotation axis. The inferred tilt is consistent with contributions
from an inductive field analogous to that observed at Europa and
Callisto. If an induced field is present, the currents would flow
in the outer mantle or aesthenosphere. Wave perturbations differ
on flux tubes that do or do not link directly to lo and its ionosphere
suggesting that the latter flux tubes are virtually stagnant in lo's
frame and that a unipolar inductor appropriately models the currents
linking Io to Jupiter's ionosphere.
Users
Please
log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).