%0 Journal Article %1 Anttila2006 %A Anttila, Heidi %A Malmivaara, Antti %A Kunz, Regina %A Autti-R?m?, Ilona %A M?kel?, Marjukka %D 2006 %J Pediatrics %K Cerebral Palsy; Child; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials; Research Design %N 6 %P 2222--2230 %R 10.1542/peds.2005-1630 %T Quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in cerebral palsy. %U http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1630 %V 117 %X OBJECTIVES: In conducting reviews on the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions on children with cerebral palsy, the assessment of trials can be hampered by problems in reporting. Therefore, we set out to evaluate trial reporting by using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement recommendations. METHODS: Randomized, controlled trials published in 1990 or later were identified in literature searches for reviews on the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions on children with cerebral palsy. Two independent reviewers evaluated the trial reporting by using a modified 33-item Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials checklist. RESULTS: We identified 15 randomized, controlled trials. Almost half (48\%) of the applicable items were reported adequately. Inadequate reporting was found in the following items: outcome measures, sample-size determination, details of the sequence generation, allocation concealment and implementation of the randomization, success of assessor blinding, recruitment and follow-up dates, intention-to-treat analysis, precision of the effect size, co-interventions, and adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small number of sufficiently reported trials were found. Because nearly all items had been described in at least 1 article, high-quality reporting seems feasible. Assessment of trials depends on appropriate reporting, and poor reporting jeopardizes judgments on the clinical implications. Authors of randomized, controlled trials are encouraged to follow the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials criteria. There is a clear need to improve the quality of reporting of trials in this field.

@article{Anttila2006, abstract = {OBJECTIVES: In conducting reviews on the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions on children with cerebral palsy, the assessment of trials can be hampered by problems in reporting. Therefore, we set out to evaluate trial reporting by using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement recommendations. METHODS: Randomized, controlled trials published in 1990 or later were identified in literature searches for reviews on the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions on children with cerebral palsy. Two independent reviewers evaluated the trial reporting by using a modified 33-item Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials checklist. RESULTS: We identified 15 randomized, controlled trials. Almost half (48\%) of the applicable items were reported adequately. Inadequate reporting was found in the following items: outcome measures, sample-size determination, details of the sequence generation, allocation concealment and implementation of the randomization, success of assessor blinding, recruitment and follow-up dates, intention-to-treat analysis, precision of the effect size, co-interventions, and adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small number of sufficiently reported trials were found. Because nearly all items had been described in at least 1 article, high-quality reporting seems feasible. Assessment of trials depends on appropriate reporting, and poor reporting jeopardizes judgments on the clinical implications. Authors of randomized, controlled trials are encouraged to follow the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials criteria. There is a clear need to improve the quality of reporting of trials in this field.}, added-at = {2014-07-19T17:42:09.000+0200}, author = {Anttila, Heidi and Malmivaara, Antti and Kunz, Regina and Autti-R?m?, Ilona and M?kel?, Marjukka}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2694ff6235d737bf61d5ffd2516f9212e/ar0berts}, doi = {10.1542/peds.2005-1630}, groups = {public}, interhash = {b2c030610558364e74b0454fb23b2256}, intrahash = {694ff6235d737bf61d5ffd2516f9212e}, journal = {Pediatrics}, keywords = {Cerebral Palsy; Child; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials; Research Design}, month = Jun, number = 6, pages = {2222--2230}, pii = {117/6/2222}, pmid = {16740868}, timestamp = {2014-07-19T17:42:09.000+0200}, title = {Quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in cerebral palsy.}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1630}, username = {ar0berts}, volume = 117, year = 2006 }