Abstract: Ontologies are enabling technology for the Semantic Web. They are a means for people to state what they mean by formal terms used in data that they might generate or consume. Folksonomies are an emergent phenomenon of the social web. They are created as people associate terms with content that they generate or consume. Recently the two ideas have been put into opposition, as if they were right and left poles of a political spectrum. This piece is an attempt to shed some cool light on the subject, and to preview some new work that applies the two ideas together to enable an Internet ecology for folksonomies
Пожалуйста, войдите в систему, чтобы принять участие в дискуссии (добавить собственные рецензию, или комментарий)
Цитировать эту публикацию
%0 Conference Proceedings
%1 gruber_mashup
%A Gruber, Tom
%D 2005
%K Gruber Thomas Tom apples diapan ecology folksonomies folksonomy internet mash mashup ontologies ontology oranges semantic social tagging tags web web2.0 wisrep10
%T Ontology of Folksonomy: A Mash-up of Apples and Oranges
%U http://tomgruber.org/writing/mtsr05-ontology-of-folksonomy.htm
%X Abstract: Ontologies are enabling technology for the Semantic Web. They are a means for people to state what they mean by formal terms used in data that they might generate or consume. Folksonomies are an emergent phenomenon of the social web. They are created as people associate terms with content that they generate or consume. Recently the two ideas have been put into opposition, as if they were right and left poles of a political spectrum. This piece is an attempt to shed some cool light on the subject, and to preview some new work that applies the two ideas together to enable an Internet ecology for folksonomies
@proceedings{gruber_mashup,
abstract = {Abstract: Ontologies are enabling technology for the Semantic Web. They are a means for people to state what they mean by formal terms used in data that they might generate or consume. Folksonomies are an emergent phenomenon of the social web. They are created as people associate terms with content that they generate or consume. Recently the two ideas have been put into opposition, as if they were right and left poles of a political spectrum. This piece is an attempt to shed some cool light on the subject, and to preview some new work that applies the two ideas together to enable an Internet ecology for folksonomies},
added-at = {2010-05-11T22:29:36.000+0200},
author = {Gruber, Tom},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2eb35be6ef66391e55d5c5e181de3ca22/dipan100},
citeulike-article-id = {411154},
interhash = {c28aeda316dc80d8e8d63358c840978b},
intrahash = {eb35be6ef66391e55d5c5e181de3ca22},
keywords = {Gruber Thomas Tom apples diapan ecology folksonomies folksonomy internet mash mashup ontologies ontology oranges semantic social tagging tags web web2.0 wisrep10},
organization = {First on-line conference on Metadata and Semantics Research (MTSR'05)},
priority = {2},
timestamp = {2010-05-11T22:29:36.000+0200},
title = {Ontology of Folksonomy: A Mash-up of Apples and Oranges},
url = {http://tomgruber.org/writing/mtsr05-ontology-of-folksonomy.htm},
year = 2005
}