%0 Journal Article %1 Sears2012 %A Sears, Erika Davis %A Chung, Kevin C %D 2012 %J Plastic and reconstructive surgery %K ClinicalCompetence ClinicalTrialsasTopic ClinicalTrialsasTopic:standards DecisionMaking GuidelinesasTopic HealthSurveys HealthSurveys:standards Humans OutcomeAssessment(HealthCare) OutcomeAssessment(HealthCare):standards Plastic Plastic:standards QualityofLife Questionnaires Questionnaires:standards ReproducibilityofResults Research Research:standards ResearchDesign SelfReport Surgery TreatmentOutcome %N 5 %P 1200-7 %R 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a2e21 %T A guide to interpreting a study of patient-reported outcomes. %U http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3340576&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract %V 129 %X Outcomes measured from the patient perspective are particularly important in plastic surgery, where many of the treatments are aimed at improving physical function, psychosocial function, and quality of life. Understanding the measurement of patient-reported outcomes is critical to determine the value of the interventions performed, to better inform clinical decision-making, and to guide policy debates. It is critical that physicians understand their patients' individual values when making treatment and policy recommendations based on evidence. This guide outlines the questions that readers should ask when appraising literature using patient-reported outcomes. %@ 1529-4242

@article{Sears2012, abstract = {Outcomes measured from the patient perspective are particularly important in plastic surgery, where many of the treatments are aimed at improving physical function, psychosocial function, and quality of life. Understanding the measurement of patient-reported outcomes is critical to determine the value of the interventions performed, to better inform clinical decision-making, and to guide policy debates. It is critical that physicians understand their patients' individual values when making treatment and policy recommendations based on evidence. This guide outlines the questions that readers should ask when appraising literature using patient-reported outcomes.}, added-at = {2023-02-03T11:44:35.000+0100}, author = {Sears, Erika Davis and Chung, Kevin C}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/256028041a503fb99827578e7b5da2985/jepcastel}, city = {Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.}, doi = {10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a2e21}, interhash = {d21f2f41a61df6b3f45d9dc428796cb8}, intrahash = {56028041a503fb99827578e7b5da2985}, isbn = {1529-4242}, issn = {1529-4242}, journal = {Plastic and reconstructive surgery}, keywords = {ClinicalCompetence ClinicalTrialsasTopic ClinicalTrialsasTopic:standards DecisionMaking GuidelinesasTopic HealthSurveys HealthSurveys:standards Humans OutcomeAssessment(HealthCare) OutcomeAssessment(HealthCare):standards Plastic Plastic:standards QualityofLife Questionnaires Questionnaires:standards ReproducibilityofResults Research Research:standards ResearchDesign SelfReport Surgery TreatmentOutcome}, month = {5}, note = {7479<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20130625; GR: K24 AR053120/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States; GR: K24 AR053120-01A2/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States; JID: 1306050; NIHMS356471; OID: NLM: NIHMS356471; OID: NLM: PMC3340576; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Mesures de resultats; Critical appraisal}, number = 5, pages = {1200-7}, pmid = {22544102}, timestamp = {2023-02-03T11:44:35.000+0100}, title = {A guide to interpreting a study of patient-reported outcomes.}, url = {http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3340576&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract}, volume = 129, year = 2012 }