%0 Journal Article %1 Scott2006 %A Scott, I %A Greenberg, P %A Poole, P %A Campbell, D %D 2006 %J Internal medicine journal %K Humans Meta-AnalysisasTopic PeerReview PracticeGuidelinesasTopic PracticeGuidelinesasTopic:standards RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:trends Research Research:standards ReviewLiteratureasTopic TreatmentOutcome RCT %N 9 %P 587-99 %R 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01140.x %T Cautionary tales in the interpretation of systematic reviews of therapy trials. %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16911551 %V 36 %X This is the second in a series of articles emphasizing the cautions in the interpretation of health-care studies. Systematic reviews are presented as comprehensive, unbiased summaries of evidence and are often referred to by clinicians, guideline developers and health policy-makers. Their strengths and limitations, and how their results can be subject to bias and misinterpretation, are discussed. %@ 1445-5994; 1444-0903

@article{Scott2006, abstract = {This is the second in a series of articles emphasizing the cautions in the interpretation of health-care studies. Systematic reviews are presented as comprehensive, unbiased summaries of evidence and are often referred to by clinicians, guideline developers and health policy-makers. Their strengths and limitations, and how their results can be subject to bias and misinterpretation, are discussed.}, added-at = {2023-02-03T11:44:35.000+0100}, author = {Scott, I and Greenberg, P and Poole, P and Campbell, D}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/27a0ffc69a3691325246e6069d917534f/jepcastel}, city = {Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. ian_scott@health.qld.gov.au}, doi = {10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01140.x}, interhash = {dac5718acc6f12419ed08dbb958c9796}, intrahash = {7a0ffc69a3691325246e6069d917534f}, isbn = {1445-5994; 1444-0903}, issn = {1445-5994}, journal = {Internal medicine journal}, keywords = {Humans Meta-AnalysisasTopic PeerReview PracticeGuidelinesasTopic PracticeGuidelinesasTopic:standards RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:trends Research Research:standards ReviewLiteratureasTopic TreatmentOutcome RCT}, month = {9}, note = {6624<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20071115; JID: 101092952; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Critical appraisal; Metaanàlisi; RCT; Introductori}, number = 9, pages = {587-99}, pmid = {16911551}, timestamp = {2023-05-04T08:59:38.000+0200}, title = {Cautionary tales in the interpretation of systematic reviews of therapy trials.}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16911551}, volume = 36, year = 2006 }