Author of the publication

Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report.

, , and . Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100 (4): 187-90 (April 2007)4554<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20071115; PUBM: Print; JID: 7802879; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Publicació.
DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.100.4.187

Please choose a person to relate this publication to

To differ between persons with the same name, the academic degree and the title of an important publication will be displayed. You can also use the button next to the name to display some publications already assigned to the person.

 

Other publications of authors with the same name

Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials., , , , , , , , , and 3 other author(s). BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 330 (7482): 88 (January 2005)Disseny; Aleatorització; RCT; Cirurgia.The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration., , , , , , , , , and . PLoS medicine, 6 (7): e1000100+ (Jul 21, 2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation., , , , , , , , and . BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 349 (jan02 1): g7647 (January 2015)Publicació; Metaanàlisi; Checklist; Protocol.Better reporting of randomized trials in biomedical journal and conference abstracts., , and . J. Inf. Sci., 34 (2): 162-173 (2008)Visualizing the history of evidence-based medicine: A bibliometric analysis., , , , , and . J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 64 (10): 2157-2172 (2013)Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report., , and . Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100 (4): 187-90 (April 2007)4554<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20071115; PUBM: Print; JID: 7802879; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Publicació.Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions, , , and . BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11 (1): 15 (2011)5934<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>M3: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-15;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Metaanàlisi; Meta-metaanàlisi.Fool's gold? Why blinded trials are not always best., , , , and . BMJ (Clinical research ed.), (January 2020)Emmascarament.