( en | de | ru )

 

Disambiguation of "Whitman, Gary"

Author of the publication

copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
Parenchymal field effect analysis for breast cancer risk assessment: evaluation of FFDM radiomic similarity.

, , , , , , , , and . Medical Imaging: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, volume 11597 of SPIE Proceedings, SPIE, (2021)

Please choose a person to relate this publication to

To differ between persons with the same name, the academic degree and the title of an important publication will be displayed. You can also use the button next to the name to display some publications already assigned to the person.

Alexander Gary

Klaus Gary

Sybil Whitman

Regina Gary

Bente Gary

 

Other publications of authors with the same name

Temporal assessment of radiomic features on clinical mammography in a high-risk population., , , , , , , , , and . Medical Imaging: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, volume 10575 of SPIE Proceedings, page 105753Q. SPIE, (2018)Parenchymal field effect analysis for breast cancer risk assessment: evaluation of FFDM radiomic similarity., , , , , , , , and . Medical Imaging: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, volume 11597 of SPIE Proceedings, SPIE, (2021)The interplay of attention economics and computer-aided detection marks in screening mammography., , , , , , and . Medical Imaging: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, volume 9787 of SPIE Proceedings, page 978711. SPIE, (2016)Toroidal Gaussian Filters for Detection and Extraction of Properties of Spiculated Masses., , , , and . ICASSP (2), page 593-596. IEEE, (2006)Evidence based detection of spiculated masses and architectural distortions., , , and . Medical Imaging: Image Processing, volume 5747 of SPIE Proceedings, SPIE, (2005)Stereoscopic Interpretation of Low-Dose Breast Tomosynthesis Projection Images., , , , , , , , , and 2 other author(s). J. Digit. Imaging, 27 (2): 248-254 (2014)Snakules: A Model-Based Active Contour Algorithm for the Annotation of Spicules on Mammography., , , , , , , and . IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 29 (10): 1768-1780 (2010)Why Does It Take Longer to Read Digital Than Film-Screen Screening Mammograms? A Partial Explanation., , , , , , and . J. Digital Imaging, 23 (2): 170-180 (2010)Comparison of Algorithms to Enhance Spicules of Spiculated Masses on Mammography., , , and . J. Digital Imaging, 21 (1): 9-17 (2008)Evaluation of Stylus for Radiographic Image Annotation., , , , , and . J. Digital Imaging, 23 (6): 701-705 (2010)