Classical knowledge representation methods traditionally work with established relations such as synonymy, hierarchy and unspecified associations. Recent developments like
ontologies and folksonomies show new forms of collaboration, indexing and knowledge representation and encourage the reconsideration of standard knowledge relationships. In a
summarizing overview we show which relations are currently utilized in elaborated knowledge representation methods and which may be inherently hidden in folksonomies and ontologies.
Source vs. Resource Ontology The notion of a resource is fundamental in current networked information systems. The term "resource" is used often, specifically in relation the World Wide Web and the W3C's semantic web activity, in standards such as Resour
This paper presents a work in progress whose
purpose is to model the handled, acquired, correct and
erroneous knowledge of individual learners engaged in
learning activities through virtual learning environments.
This knowledge is represented according to a cognitivecomputational
model which also serves to represent the
domain knowledge via an authoring tool. The latter
generates structures that allow the tutor to provide an
effective feedback to improve significantly the cognitive
level of the learner.
M. Greaves. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS 2009), volume 5662 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, page 1. Springer, (2009)
P. Heymann, D. Ramage, and H. Garcia-Molina. SIGIR '08: Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, page 531--538. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2008)
W. Jaskowski, K. Krawiec, and B. Wieloch. GECCO '07: Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on
Genetic and evolutionary computation, 2, page 1620--1627. London, ACM Press, (7-11 July 2007)
H. Pfeiffer, and J. Pfeiffer. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS 2007), volume 4604 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, page 484-487. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, (July 2007)
P. Gehring, and R. Wille. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS 2006), volume 4068 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, page 215-228. Springer, (2006)
M. Keeler, and H. Pfeiffer. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS 2006), volume 4068 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, page 314-330. Springer, (2006)
N. Guarino. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS 2006), volume 4068 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, page 1. Springer, (2006)
N. Fuchs. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS 2005), volume 3596 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, page 51-51. Springer, (2005)
G. Streeter, and A. Potter. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS 2004), volume 3127 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, page 361-374. Springer, (2004)
A. Halevy, and J. Madhavan. IJCAI-03, Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Joint Conference
on Artificial Intelligence, Acapulco, Mexico, August 9-15, 2003, page 1567-1572. Morgan Kaufmann, (2003)
G. Stumme. Database and Expert Systems Applications. Proc. DEXA 2002, volume 2453 of LNCS, page 534-546. Heidelberg, Springer, (2002)Invited Talk, summary of stumme02computing and pasquierinpressgenerating.
O. Gerbé, and G. Mineau. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS 2002), volume 2393 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, page 205-219. Springer, (2002)
E. Bayegan. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Information Technology, Mathematics and Electrical Engineering, (2002)Papers III and IV "This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.".