Sparklis lets you explore a RDF dataset through a SPARQL endpoint without the need to read or write SPARQL queries. Queries are displayed in natural language syntax, and are incrementally built by clicking suggested query elements, and by inserting them at the current focus. Only relevant suggestions are made, so that empty results are avoided.
What is the Semantic Web? Read on for a brief introduction to the Semantic Web, how to get started using it, and to understand why we should invest in making our content semantic.
Ontotext GraphDB is a highly-efficient and robust graph database with RDF and SPARQL support. This documentation is a comprehensive guide, which explains every feature of GraphDB as well as topics such as setting up a repository, loading and working with data, tuning its performance, scaling, etc.
Here is a short overview and comparison of RDF querying with SPARQL and Jena which is presented as follows: 1. SPARQL; 2. SPARQL from inside Jena; 3. Explicit and implicit relations when querying with Jena 4.Querying remote SPARQL endpoitns
Here is a short overview and comparison of RDF querying with SPARQL and Jena which is presented as follows: 1. SPARQL; 2. SPARQL from inside Jena; 3. Explicit and implicit relations when querying with Jena 4.Querying remote SPARQL endpoitns
J. Frey, and S. Hellmann. 13th International Conference on Semantic Systems Proceedings (SEMANTiCS 2017) - Posters & Demonstrations Track, (September 2017)
N. Ikonomov, B. Simeonov, J. Parvanova, and V. Alexiev. Digital Presentation and Preservation of Cultural and Scientific Heritage (DiPP 2013), Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria, (September 2013)
J. Frey, and S. Hellmann. 13th International Conference on Semantic Systems Proceedings (SEMANTiCS 2017) - Posters & Demonstrations Track, (September 2017)
K. Endris, S. Faisal, F. Orlandi, S. Auer, and S. Scerri. International Semantic Web Conference (1), volume 9366 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, page 513-529. Springer, (2015)
P. Fafalios, T. Yannakis, and Y. Tzitzikas. 20th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL'16), Hannover, Germany, (2016)
A. Andreevski, R. Stojanov, M. Jovanovik, and D. Trajanov. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Informatics and Information Technologies (CIIT 2015), page 131--134. Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Skopje, (2015)
R. Jäschke, and S. Rudolph. Contributions to the 11th International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, page 19--34. Technische Universität Dresden, (May 2013)
R. Jäschke, and S. Rudolph. Contributions to the 11th International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, page 19--34. Technische Universität Dresden, (May 2013)
A. Ahmeti, D. Calvanese, and A. Polleres. Proceedings of the 13th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), volume 8796 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, page 441-456. Springer, (2014)
A. Ahmeti, D. Calvanese, and A. Polleres. Proceedings of the 27th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL), volume 1193 of CEUR Electronic Workshop Proceedings, \upshape\protecthttp://ceur-ws.org/, page 8-20. (2014)
R. Jäschke, and S. Rudolph. Contributions to the 11th International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, page 19--34. Technische Universität Dresden, (May 2013)
R. Jäschke, and S. Rudolph. Contributions to the 11th International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, page 19--34. Technische Universität Dresden, (May 2013)
F. Amarger, O. Haemmerlé, N. Hernandez, and C. Pradel. Proceedings of the 21th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS 2013), volume 7735 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, page 75-89. Springer, (2013)
B. Elliott, E. Cheng, C. Thomas-Ogbuji, and Z. Ozsoyoglu. Proceedings of the 2009 International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium, page 31--42. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2009)
P. Heim, S. Lohmann, D. Tsendragchaa, and T. Ertl. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Semantic Systems (I-SEMANTICS 2011), page 175-178. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2011)