Albert Einstein prägte mit seiner Relativitätstheorie und Arbeit zur Quantenmechanik unser heutiges Weltbild – was hätte er zur Digitalisierung zu sagen? Dr. Tobias Roth und Stefanie Schaus erörtern unter Bezug auf physikalische Theorien und Methodik mögliche Antworten. In ihrem Gastbeitrag zur Ad-hoc AG „Hochschulbildung für das digitale Zeitalter im europäischen Kontext“ diskutieren sie auch, wie Meinungsbildung in einer digitalen „Wissens-Welt“ gelingen kann und zeigen auf, welchen Werkzeugkasten die naturwissenschaftliche Bildung hierfür mitbringt.
People have ideas about science based on personal experiences, previous education, popular media and peer culture. Many of these ideas are commonly held misconceptions or myths about the nature of science. Here are some of the more common myths that are problematic in science education.
Welcome to the companion website for Recipes for Science: An Introduction to Scientific Methods and Reasoning! On this website, you can find: Example syllabi for different kinds of courses that use this textbook Slides presenting material and illustrations from the textbook Exercises and extended projects for additional practice and learning assessment Additional resources for a…
Science should be done with all the "best" words. Data is shown via tweets. Folks with "intelligence" not to be trusted. China is mathematically removed in climate change projections. Hypotheses all end with a "CHA-CHING!" Scientific credentials include showing your birth certificate. "Pussy" is a medically recognized term. Citations include lawsuits. Expert peer review still sound, except for the bit about "expert." All computer stuff to be done by some guy in New Jersey: not Russia. Breibart News is a credible scientific source. Scientific community includes that crazy relative of yours who believes mermaids are real but climate change is not. Impact factor to be replaced with "Is it YUGE?" factor. Bullshit, now the norm.