%0 Journal Article %1 ahmad2013comparision %D 2013 %E Ahmad, Tauseef %J Reviews of Progress %K Chelex DNA Extraction Organic RT-PCR %N 1 %T COMPARISION OF TWO DNA EXTRACTION METHODS USING THE RT-PCR %U http://reviewsofprogress.org/UploadedArticle/2.pdf %V 1 %X The rapid development of molecular genetic analysis tools has made it possible to analyze most biological material even they are in a small quantity. Many different extraction protocols are being used to isolate DNA. However not all extraction methods perform equally well with heavily inhibited factors and sometimes is very important to choose an extraction procedure that could extract DNA efficiency and had the ability to minimize the amount of inhibitors co-extracted with the sample.

@article{ahmad2013comparision, abstract = {The rapid development of molecular genetic analysis tools has made it possible to analyze most biological material even they are in a small quantity. Many different extraction protocols are being used to isolate DNA. However not all extraction methods perform equally well with heavily inhibited factors and sometimes is very important to choose an extraction procedure that could extract DNA efficiency and had the ability to minimize the amount of inhibitors co-extracted with the sample.}, added-at = {2014-08-16T14:26:15.000+0200}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/264fae2b64a3d18a89e17a3c8184cbacb/sciencejournal}, editor = {Ahmad, Tauseef}, interhash = {8cfbc724a6b8d540f7ac2bc358de93fc}, intrahash = {64fae2b64a3d18a89e17a3c8184cbacb}, journal = {Reviews of Progress }, keywords = {Chelex DNA Extraction Organic RT-PCR}, month = may, number = 1, timestamp = {2014-08-16T14:26:15.000+0200}, title = {COMPARISION OF TWO DNA EXTRACTION METHODS USING THE RT-PCR }, url = {http://reviewsofprogress.org/UploadedArticle/2.pdf}, volume = 1, year = 2013 }